Feminism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
grammar and general readability/clarity improvements
mNo edit summary |
(grammar and general readability/clarity improvements) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
[[File:Redpillcomics19.jpg|thumb|right|<center></center>]] | [[File:Redpillcomics19.jpg|thumb|right|<center></center>]] | ||
Over a hundred years ago, advanced technology and industrialization | Over a hundred years ago, due to the labor and innovation of men, advanced technology and industrialization began to rapidly change society. This had the effect of making jobs safer for women, and so women joined the workforce. Now that women were comfy enough to claim taxpayer status, men gave women the vote and positions of power in politics and the workplace. This occurred before the 'feminist' or 'suffragette' movement even began. The first wave feminist movement mainly occurred in the late 19th century, with Denmark being the first country having a feminist movement starting in 1871. Women started getting the right to vote in the 1700s (in municipal elections in some limited jurisdictions, and in the short lived independent Republic of Corsica), the same century the industrial revolution started, and way before any suffragette movement. | ||
Only problem with this new paradigm is that women usually aren't sexually attracted to men who are lower in hierarchies of [[social status]] and money than they are. So as women gained dominance in traditional male hierarchies, they complained a bunch about there being 'no good men'<ref>https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bj5yv/youre-single-because-there-arent-enough-men-253</ref><ref>[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6004239/High-flying-career-women-refusing-marry-despite-struggling-Mr-Right.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6004239/High-flying-career-women-refusing-marry-despite-struggling-Mr-Right.html]</ref> aka the dwindling amount of men wealthier or more powerful than them to give them [[tingles]]. As fewer men gave them [[tingles]] more [[incel|incels]] were created and more men were [[MGTOW|sent their own way]]. And as women gained more dominance in society they complained more about beta males, and "[[rape]]" etc... | Only problem with this new paradigm is that women usually aren't sexually attracted to men who are lower in hierarchies of [[social status]] and money than they are. So as women gained dominance in traditional male hierarchies, they complained a bunch about there being 'no good men'<ref>https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3bj5yv/youre-single-because-there-arent-enough-men-253</ref><ref>[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6004239/High-flying-career-women-refusing-marry-despite-struggling-Mr-Right.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6004239/High-flying-career-women-refusing-marry-despite-struggling-Mr-Right.html]</ref> aka the dwindling amount of men wealthier or more powerful than them to give them [[tingles]]. As fewer men gave them [[tingles]] more [[incel|incels]] were created and more men were [[MGTOW|sent their own way]]. And as women gained more dominance in society they complained more about beta males, and "[[rape]]" etc... | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
==Female Contempt for an Obvious Outcome of Feminism: Househusbands== | ==Female Contempt for an Obvious Outcome of Feminism: Househusbands== | ||
A world where young women make more money than young men would seem to necessitate an increase in house-husbands. The [[male liberation]] movement, a subset of male [[feminist]] [[MRA|MRAs]] in the 60s wanted a dramatic increase in househusbands. However even in the most feminist countries, women will still expect the man to work or else | A world where young women make more money than young men would seem to necessitate an increase in house-husbands. The [[male liberation]] movement, a subset of male [[feminist]] [[MRA|MRAs]] in the 60s wanted a dramatic increase in househusbands. However even in the most feminist countries, women will still expect the man to work or else they will breakup, '''even if she makes enough to provide for the family in an uber-welfare state'''. This is of course, insanely pointless. | ||
Even in a country where feminism is institutional and mainstream, where equal-pay laws are in place, and where women have more total personal wealth than men, "the key factor in the decision to divorce is whether Hubby (note, '''not''' the wife) has a job. If he doesn’t, even if his job loss is involuntary, his odds of being ditched by his wife skyrocket"<ref>https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/23125-does-cohabitation-explain-the-decline-in-the-divorce-rate</ref> | Even in a country where feminism is institutional and mainstream, where equal-pay laws are in place, and where women have more total personal wealth than men, "the key factor in the decision to divorce is whether Hubby (note, '''not''' the wife) has a job. If he doesn’t, even if his job loss is involuntary, his odds of being ditched by his wife skyrocket"<ref>https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/23125-does-cohabitation-explain-the-decline-in-the-divorce-rate</ref> | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
==Anti-science== | ==Anti-science== | ||
[[File:Ffeminism.jpg|thumb|328x328px]] | [[File:Ffeminism.jpg|thumb|328x328px]] | ||
In general, feminists hate any studies which have to do with mating, including but not limited to studies from sociology, social psychology, and evolutionary biology. The main arch nemesis of feminism in the social sciences is evolutionary psychology, which many feminists regard as a pseudo-scientific veneer over its | In general, feminists hate any studies which have to do with mating, including, but not limited to, studies from sociology, social psychology, and evolutionary biology. The main arch nemesis of feminism in the social sciences is evolutionary psychology, which many feminists regard as a pseudo-scientific veneer over its practitioner's misogyny, despite there existing a minor trend in feminism that attempts to integrate some of its findings as they pertain to women and the relations between the sexes. | ||
There is also a trend in modern feminism that regards the very Aristotelean foundations of Western empirical though as being a mere artefact of the patriachy; a male imposition of rigid logic in opposition to the supposedly superior 'female intuition'. | There is also a trend in modern feminism that regards the very Aristotelean foundations of Western empirical though as being a mere artefact of the patriachy; a male imposition of rigid logic in opposition to the supposedly superior 'female intuition'. | ||