23
edits
Truecel: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''truecel''' | A '''truecel''' is assumed to be doomed into [[inceldom]] due to some unchangeable characteristics and or physical features that they possess. In parts of the incelosphere, hyper focusing on [[lookism]], e.g. parts of the [[blackpill]] community, such characteristics are assumed to be primarily extreme [[ugliness]], disfigurement and high [[mutation|mutational load]], with perhaps overlap with [[medcel]]dom. | ||
Truecels are considered those at the rock-bottom [[decile]] in terms of SMV ([[Sexual market value|sexual marketplace value]]) and [[LMS]]; as such a 1/10 on the [[Decile|decile chart]]. In terms of appearance, truecels typically range from very ugly to being so nauseatingly hideous, merely looking at their face makes one go ''yuck''. This category of [[inceldom]] includes deformed people. | Truecels are considered those at the rock-bottom [[decile]] in terms of SMV ([[Sexual market value|sexual marketplace value]]) and [[LMS]]; as such a 1/10 on the [[Decile|decile chart]]. In terms of appearance, truecels typically range from very ugly to being so nauseatingly hideous, merely looking at their face makes one go ''yuck''. This category of [[inceldom]] includes deformed people. | ||
A stronger predictor of sexlessness than [[looks]] is, however, [[neurodivergence]], especially odd, [[introverted]], [[shy]], highly [[Inhibition|inhibited]], anxious and [[autism|autistic]] behavior (especially for [[males]]), as well as lack of [[dating]] skills and lack of cultural [[marriage]] norms (see [[causes of inceldom]]). | A stronger predictor of sexlessness than [[looks]] is, however, [[neurodivergence]], especially odd, [[introverted]], [[shy]], highly [[Inhibition|inhibited]], anxious and [[autism|autistic]] behavior (especially for [[males]]), as well as lack of [[dating]] skills and lack of cultural [[marriage]] norms (see [[causes of inceldom]]). | ||
While it is true that below average attractiveness predicts about twice as high of a chance of remaining virgin in early adulthood than above-average attractiveness, in one study, all of the 26 very unattractive men and 33 of the 38 very unattractive women did have sex by about age 28.<ref>Haydon, A. A., Cheng, M. M., Herring, A. H., McRee, A.-L., & Halpern, C. T. (2013). Prevalence and Predictors of Sexual Inexperience in Adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(2), 221–230. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0164-3</ref> This means that if severe physical ugliness does indeed have a drastic effect on mating performance as claimed, this must be limited to only the 1% least attractive (likely even less). This is also evidenced by physical attractiveness only weakly predicting the number of past sex partners, despite looks playing a large role in initial romantic interest (see also [[beauty]]). In a sample of physically disabled individuals, 47% did not have a partner, while in a matching sample of non-disabled individuals, 30% did not have a partner.<ref>Taleporos, G., & McCabe, M. P. (2002). Sexuality and Disability, 20(3), 177–183. doi:10.1023/a:1021493615456</ref> | While it is true that below-average attractiveness predicts about twice as high of a chance of remaining virgin in early adulthood than above-average attractiveness, in one study, all of the 26 very unattractive men and 33 of the 38 very unattractive women did have sex by about age 28.<ref>Haydon, A. A., Cheng, M. M., Herring, A. H., McRee, A.-L., & Halpern, C. T. (2013). Prevalence and Predictors of Sexual Inexperience in Adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(2), 221–230. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0164-3</ref> This means that if severe physical ugliness does indeed have a drastic effect on mating performance as claimed, this must be limited to only the 1% least attractive (likely even less). This is also evidenced by physical attractiveness only weakly predicting the number of past sex partners, despite looks playing a large role in initial romantic interest (see also [[beauty]]). In a sample of physically disabled individuals, 47% did not have a partner, while in a matching sample of non-disabled individuals, 30% did not have a partner.<ref>Taleporos, G., & McCabe, M. P. (2002). Sexuality and Disability, 20(3), 177–183. doi:10.1023/a:1021493615456</ref> | ||
The average truecel is argued to be so oxytocin-starved, even a brief touching of fingers whilst exchanging cash with a female store clerk who looks like Whoopi Goldberg or Rosie O'Donnell can send truecels over the moon in a frenzy of euphoria. | The average truecel is argued to be so oxytocin-starved, even a brief touching of fingers whilst exchanging cash with a female store clerk who looks like Whoopi Goldberg or Rosie O'Donnell can send truecels over the moon in a frenzy of euphoria. | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
[[Category:Trueceldom]] | [[Category:Trueceldom]] | ||
{{B}} | {{B}} | ||
{{#seo: | |||
|description=A truecel is assumed to be doomed into inceldom due to some unchangeable characteristics and or physical features that they possess. | |||
|published_time={{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}} | |||
}} | |||