Heightpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
495 bytes added ,  26 September 2021
m
Added a blueheightpill
No edit summary
m (Added a blueheightpill)
Line 15: Line 15:
[[File:Sergg.jpg|900x900px|center|<center></center>‎]]
[[File:Sergg.jpg|900x900px|center|<center></center>‎]]
In a study on humans published in Animal Studies, it was shown that men who are between 5'3" (160 cm) and 5'6" (168 cm) are anywhere from 3–10 times less attractive than average height men, solely because of their height.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236670565_The_height_of_choosiness_Mutual_mate_choice_for_stature_results_in_suboptimal_pair_formation_for_both_sexes</ref>
In a study on humans published in Animal Studies, it was shown that men who are between 5'3" (160 cm) and 5'6" (168 cm) are anywhere from 3–10 times less attractive than average height men, solely because of their height.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236670565_The_height_of_choosiness_Mutual_mate_choice_for_stature_results_in_suboptimal_pair_formation_for_both_sexes</ref>
== Bluepill argument on Heightmatching ==
The Bluepill argument against the heightpill is that the male-female height difference is platonic at 15cm<ref>https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-common-is-it-for-a-man-to-be-shorter-than-his-partner/</ref> or 6in<ref>https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2019/11/06/man-woman-couple-height-updated/</ref>. CoffeeMeetsBagel<ref>https://coffeemeetsbagel.com/blog/dating-statistics/how-tall-are-you-really/</ref> reflects this sentiment as well.
==Female reaction to manlets on social media==
==Female reaction to manlets on social media==
[[File:Loll2.JPG|full|center]]
[[File:Loll2.JPG|full|center]]
398

edits

Navigation menu