General discussion: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
109 bytes added ,  15 September 2021
No edit summary
Line 148: Line 148:
== Viewing Male Requirements from the eyes of Male Hierarchy ==
== Viewing Male Requirements from the eyes of Male Hierarchy ==
ChildNeedsFather giving a stronger Descriptor of Social Castes <nowiki>https://archive.fo/04qmb</nowiki> with comparison with FDS-like coaches https://archive.fo/b4JJW
ChildNeedsFather giving a stronger Descriptor of Social Castes <nowiki>https://archive.fo/04qmb</nowiki> with comparison with FDS-like coaches https://archive.fo/b4JJW
In relations to ThePowerMoves https://archive.fo/XvqZM and PSILoveYou [https://archive.fo/T0mtp https://archive.fo]/T0mtp


Comparison to Moral Foundations: https://doi.org<nowiki/>/10.1111/pops.12361
Comparison to Moral Foundations: https://doi.org<nowiki/>/10.1111/pops.12361
Line 214: Line 216:
|Self-Transcendence + Openness to Change
|Self-Transcendence + Openness to Change
|-
|-
|https://psiloveyou.xyz
|PSILoveYou
|"Sigma Male" (Chad + Incel)
|"Sigma Male" (Chad + Incel)
|Fuckboys (Chad + Soft Boys)
|Fuckboys (Chad + Soft Boys)
|Nice Guys (Soft Boys + Incel)
|Nice Guys (Soft Boys + Incel)
|-
|-
|The Power Moves
|The Power Moves in
|Lover + Friend
|Lover + Friend
|Lover + Provider
|Lover + Provider
Line 280: Line 282:
* https://archive.ph/6l1X5
* https://archive.ph/6l1X5
* <nowiki>https://archive.ph/Jwb3m</nowiki>
* <nowiki>https://archive.ph/Jwb3m</nowiki>
== War on Tomboys as Proxy to "Revolt Against Society" ==
== War on Tomboys as Proxy to "Revolt Against Society" ==
The arguments put forth by (the Complementary Argument) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myZ3vbvpH7w
The arguments put forth by (the Complementary Argument) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myZ3vbvpH7w
* The ones that are attracted to Tomboys are effeminate men
* The ones that are attracted to Tomboys are effeminate men
* Tomboys are effectively a fetish
* Tomboys are effectively a fetish
Line 289: Line 289:
* Tomboys are less likely to be motherly (more likely to be effectively infertile), thus aiding modernity
* Tomboys are less likely to be motherly (more likely to be effectively infertile), thus aiding modernity
* (Lack of noting whether there is a mating mechanism behind this)
* (Lack of noting whether there is a mating mechanism behind this)
The arguments put forth by Vee (the Assortative Argument) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXVqw6XW8
The arguments put forth by Vee (the Assortative Argument) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXVqw6XW8
* Tomboys are attracted to masculine men
* Tomboys are attracted to masculine men
* Effeminate men are just salty that they cannot have the "physique" OR the women
* Effeminate men are just salty that they cannot have the "physique" OR the women
Line 297: Line 295:
* The private space of mating and reproduction shall not be infringed
* The private space of mating and reproduction shall not be infringed
* (Lack of noting whether Tomboys and Infertility are part of modernity)
* (Lack of noting whether Tomboys and Infertility are part of modernity)
The aggregate idea of the two videos:
The aggregate idea of the two videos:
* There is a "balancing loop" effect on male and female masculinity preference (Masculine woman want Masculine men, Masculine men want feminine women)
* There is a "balancing loop" effect on male and female masculinity preference (Masculine woman want Masculine men, Masculine men want feminine women)
* There is a rift between Tomboyism and Effeminate men as the main source of the reproductive decline, but there are clear signs that Tomboyism/Feminism moves first.
* There is a rift between Tomboyism and Effeminate men as the main source of the reproductive decline, but there are clear signs that Tomboyism/Feminism moves first.
398

edits

Navigation menu