Feminism: Difference between revisions

Feminists in the United States take it as almost axiomatic that human penises are disgusting. Modern US millennial feminist posters relentlessly shame penises as being 'abundant and therefore low value and not important', [[neoliberalism|implying that male sexuality '''should''' be evaluated on a free mawket demand/supply curve rather than society adjusting for inequality]]. Men are taught from a very early age to be ashamed of their genitalia by religion, but once they enter the adult world, this shaming is also partly institutionalized by feminism. The process of making men ashamed of their own sexual organs is part of the 'neutering' process critics of feminism reference. Penis shaming also probably contributes to perverted forms of male exhibitionism, which is often done in desperation of female recognition. The goal of penis shaming is to lower the value of men, and it's working.

{{clear}}

[[File:Feminism.jpg|thumb|right]]

Some feminist anti-incels hold social Darwinist, [[eugenics|eugenicist]] views and believe in the [[good genes hypothesis]] that women always choose the best genes and hence women's sexual liberation is a great benefit for humanity as men with poor genes won't reproduce as much. If increasing female sexual freedom results in sharp increases of male inceldom, they see this as a necessary and welcome development. One such feminist activist even worked for the FBI.<ref>[https://archive.fo/ZiejW http://archive.is/ZiejW]</ref> In truth, there is little evidence that female mate choice is beneficial for humanity. Rather, a significant share of women seem to desire anti-social men,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Personality</ref> and physical attractiveness and is only very weakly correlated with overall health status<ref>10.0.4.13/0033-2909.131.5.63</ref> and overall mating success is not associated with various health markers at all.<ref>https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.160603</ref>