Trusted, Automoderated users
5,366
edits
Feminism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→A 100% Completed Feminist World Be Better for Incels Than Partial Feminism... Theory: various improvements
(→A 100% Completed Feminist World Be Better for Incels Than Partial Feminism... Theory: various improvements) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
A choice quote from the works previously referenced, ''The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture'': | A choice quote from the works previously referenced, ''The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture'': | ||
{{Quote|Fifteen feminists leaders, when asked what traits they sought in a man, regularly used words which connote high status: "very rich" or "brilliant" or "genius". Large tips, lavish dinners, stunning suits, and so forth were regularly referred to. In short these (feminist) women wanted superpowerful men.}} | {{Quote|Fifteen feminists leaders, when asked what traits they sought in a man, regularly used words which connote high status: "very rich" or "brilliant" or "genius". Large tips, lavish dinners, stunning suits, and so forth were regularly referred to. In short these (feminist) women wanted superpowerful men.}} | ||
It seems that women therefore, naturally recoil at the idea of not using a man to financially provide for her, calling such men who are poor or who don't live up to masculine gender roles as, "manchildren", no matter how generous the welfare state she is in or how much money she makes. | It seems that women therefore, naturally recoil at the idea of not using a man to financially provide for her, calling such men who are poor or who don't live up to masculine gender roles as, "manchildren", no matter how generous the welfare state she is in or how much money she makes. | ||
==A 100% Completed Feminist World Be Better for Incels Than Partial Feminism | =="A 100% Completed Feminist World Be Better for Incels Than Partial Feminism" Theory== | ||
So far we see that feminism literally creates incels, but there '''may''' be a silver lining in a 100% feminist universe compared to a partial feminist universe, in that feminists feminize societies to the point where all men are so beta that the male intra-sexual competition may become smaller. Since no men ask women out in the 100% feminist universe once men are so [[beta]]. Becoming more feminist but not getting to 100% feminism may also be desirable for incels to avoid polygamy. Because of the impetus for women to achieve college degrees *and date*, assuming monogamy is enforced by non-feminist entities, feminism may continue to force more women to date down in educational status, letting more men not have to date complete morons. | So far we see that feminism literally creates incels, but there '''may''' be a silver lining in a 100% feminist universe compared to a partial feminist universe, in that feminists feminize societies to the point where all men are so beta that the male intra-sexual competition may become smaller. Since no men ask women out in the 100% feminist universe once men are so [[beta]]. Becoming more feminist but not getting to 100% feminism may also be desirable for incels to avoid polygamy. Because of the impetus for women to achieve college degrees *and date*, assuming monogamy is enforced by non-feminist entities, feminism may continue to force more women to date down in educational status, letting more men not have to date complete morons. | ||
===The Less Difference Between the Sexes, the Less of a Problem Feminism Becomes=== | ===The Less Difference Between the Sexes, the Less of a Problem Feminism Becomes=== | ||
[[File:Roosh112.png|671x671px|Pick-up aritve [[Roosh V]] found that Denmark was not sexually dimorphic enogh for him to exercise "[[game]]"|thumb]] | |||
[[Otto Weininger]] argued that in humans, the less sexually dimorphic the genders, the less of a problem female [[sexual liberation]] becomes. Whereas, if there is high [[sexual dimorphism]] in humans, female sexual liberation leads to agitation, domestic abuse against husbands, and [[IM LIEK SUCH A NERD LOL|corruption of the arts and science by feminine women expressing vanity and seeking male attention]]. | [[Otto Weininger]] argued that in humans, the less sexually dimorphic the genders, the less of a problem female [[sexual liberation]] becomes. Whereas, if there is high [[sexual dimorphism]] in humans, female sexual liberation leads to agitation, domestic abuse against husbands, and [[IM LIEK SUCH A NERD LOL|corruption of the arts and science by feminine women expressing vanity and seeking male attention]]. | ||
The problem is that sexually liberated women naturally promote sexual dimorphism, which is widely known as the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-equality_paradox gender equality paradox]. So obviously, freeing the sexual marketplace isn't the first step to a free sexual market without civilizational decline. In order to establish women a free sexual market peacefully, if such a thing were desirable, first attention should be paid to reducing sexual dimorphism or sex differences, even if that means reducing female sexual choice temporarily. If such a change were made permanent, and there was very little sexual dimorphism between the sexes, to the point of almost not being able to distinguish between the sexes, female sexual liberation would probably not [[J. D. Unwin|lead to civilizational decline]], or at least the kind that we see now. | The problem is that sexually liberated women naturally promote sexual dimorphism, which is widely known as the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-equality_paradox gender equality paradox]. So obviously, freeing the sexual marketplace isn't the first step to a free sexual market without civilizational decline. In order to establish women a free sexual market peacefully, if such a thing were desirable, first attention should be paid to reducing sexual dimorphism or sex differences, even if that means reducing female sexual choice temporarily. If such a change were made permanent, and there was very little sexual dimorphism between the sexes, to the point of almost not being able to distinguish between the sexes, female sexual liberation would probably not [[J. D. Unwin|lead to civilizational decline]], or at least the kind that we see now. | ||
=="The Eradication of Feminism is Best for Incels" Theory== | |||
==The Eradication of Feminism is Best for Incels | |||
Because feminism has created more incels, many if not most self-identified incels don't subscribe to the previous theory and think '''modern''' matriarchies won't be sexually generous. Also, given prominent feminists have explicitly called for an, "end of men", anti-feminists have every right to be wary of feminist's attitude towards the health of men. | Because feminism has created more incels, many if not most self-identified incels don't subscribe to the previous theory and think '''modern''' matriarchies won't be sexually generous. Also, given prominent feminists have explicitly called for an, "end of men", anti-feminists have every right to be wary of feminist's attitude towards the health of men. | ||
<center><youtube>103uTU-lmsY</youtube></center> | <center><youtube>103uTU-lmsY</youtube></center> | ||
| Line 50: | Line 48: | ||
[[File:Feminism3.png|full|center]] | [[File:Feminism3.png|full|center]] | ||
==Penis Shaming== | ==Penis Shaming== | ||
[[File:Abundant2.jpg|100x100px|left]] | {{See also|[[Dicklet]]}}[[File:Abundant2.jpg|100x100px|left]] | ||
[[File:Abundant.png|thumb|right|As mentioned before, feminists regularly celebrate male disposability]] | [[File:Abundant.png|thumb|right|As mentioned before, feminists regularly celebrate [[male disposability]]]] | ||
Feminists in the United States take it as almost axiomatic that human penises are disgusting. Modern US millennial feminist posters relentlessly shame penises as being 'abundant and therefore low value and not important', [[neoliberalism|implying that male sexuality '''should''' be evaluated on a | Feminists in the United States take it as almost axiomatic that human penises are disgusting. Modern US millennial feminist posters relentlessly shame penises as being 'abundant and therefore low value and not important', [[neoliberalism|implying that male sexuality '''should''' be evaluated on a free mawket demand/supply curve rather than society adjusting for inequality]]. Men are taught from a very early age to be ashamed of their genitalia by religion, but once they enter the adult world, this shaming is also partly institutionalized by feminism. The process of making men ashamed of their own sexual organs is part of the 'neutering' process critics of feminism reference. Penis shaming also probably contributes to perverted forms of male exhibitionism, which is often done in desperation of female recognition. The goal of penis shaming is to lower the value of men, and it's working. | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
[[File:Feminism.jpg|thumb|right]] | [[File:Feminism.jpg|thumb|right]] | ||