Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
There also exist fears that the construct could also be used to apply positive or negative incentives to those who are found to be higher or lower in this factor as a form of social engineering, similar to the intention behind the Chinese government's 'social credit' system. | There also exist fears that the construct could also be used to apply positive or negative incentives to those who are found to be higher or lower in this factor as a form of social engineering, similar to the intention behind the Chinese government's 'social credit' system. | ||
Arguing against the concept on scientific grounds, several researchers have labelled the construct a statistical chimera (similar to arguments made against the validity of IQ tests) or have claimed it is merely an artifact of social desirability bias (i.e. this construct is just measuring impression management skills and nothing innate).<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886919302685</ref> Opponents of the theory claim that certain lower level facets of the Big Five can often predict social behaviors better than any proposed overarching structure like the GFP. | Arguing against the concept on scientific grounds, several researchers have labelled the construct a statistical chimera (similar to arguments made against the validity of IQ tests) or have claimed it is merely an artifact of social desirability bias (i.e. this construct is just measuring impression management skills and nothing innate).<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886919302685</ref> Opponents of the theory claim that certain lower level facets of the Big Five can often predict social behaviors better than any proposed overarching structure like the GFP. | ||
== See also == | |||
* [[Personality]] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Theories]] | [[Category:Theories]] |