6,453
edits
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
There has been a secular decline in testosterone in Western countries,<ref>https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/92/1/196/2598434?login=true</ref> leading to sensationalist headlines regarding rampant [[soyboy|feminization]] of men being driven by this factor alone. However, other longitudinal studies have found concurrent evidence that sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), a protein that binds to testosterone and makes it inert in the body, has also been decreasing on a population and cohort level.<ref>https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/92/12/4696/2597312?login=true</ref> | There has been a secular decline in testosterone in Western countries,<ref>https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/92/1/196/2598434?login=true</ref> leading to sensationalist headlines regarding rampant [[soyboy|feminization]] of men being driven by this factor alone. However, other longitudinal studies have found concurrent evidence that sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), a protein that binds to testosterone and makes it inert in the body, has also been decreasing on a population and cohort level.<ref>https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/92/12/4696/2597312?login=true</ref> | ||
If this finding proves robust, this reduction in SHBG | If this finding proves robust, this reduction in SHBG would result in less negative feedback being exerted on men's hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPG axis), which would lead to the body downregulating T production as it essentially needs less to produce the desired effects. Meaning the secular decrease in T wouldn't be relevant in driving any practical differences in population level masculinization. | ||
==Dual hormone hypothesis== | ==Dual hormone hypothesis== |
edits