Chad: Difference between revisions

Cross-culturally, there is little evidence that women prefer masculine faces exclusively, with men's facial masculinity seemingly mostly unrelated to their overall facial attractiveness,<ref>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0225549</ref> though this appears to vary by ecological and mating context. Humans are substantially [[wikipedia:Self-domestication|self-domesticated]] and therefore [[neoteny|neotenous]] (meaning retaining youthful features) such that some facial neoteny is also attractive in men (see [[pretty boy]]). In contrast, Chad's muscular body is nearly universally attractive to women.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Rated_strength_is_the_main_predictor_of_men.27s_bodily_attractiveness._No_women_prefer_weak_men</ref> However, women's attraction to more muscular males likely falls within a [[goldilocks zone]], with extreme levels of muscularity (such as what can be achieved via steroid abuse) possibly being detrimental to men's sexual attractiveness, however, as it is completely abnormal.

It has been noted that high fitness fathers (Chads) whilst they do produce high fitness sons (Sexy Sons Hypothesis) tend to also produce low fitness daughters and vise versa for Stacy's. This is because of certain traits that are expressed in both sexes but the optimal expression for that trait is different for both sexes. The most notable example of this in humans are the hips. In females the hips are selected to be wider for child birth and in males they are selected to narrower for movement and hunting. The constant tug and pull (antagonism) of selective pressures to have narrow hips in men but wider hips in women ensures that the trait doesn't go to far in either direction and unless sex-limited/sex-specific expression for a trait is coded for by a new gene this sexual antagonism will continue.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227510622_Intersexual_ontogenic_conflict?_sg=xJj1oz_d9_SyuuhUv-SFaxlPwbuaS699leCMkfn9DR3qKPdFLYlsf2dLNqYV0B7kC2cXGJd13ibKC7E</ref> The most popular example of this can be found in Asian/Oriental women (whom are in general more attractive than white women). Asians in general exhibit higher levels of neoteny than other races; as a result Asian women are the most sought over demographic on dating sites, because of this there are an overabundance of Asian Stacys. Typically these Asian Stacys catch white fever and will mate and have children with White Men; because neoteny is not completely sex-specific in its expression we find that High Fitness Asian Stacys produce Lower Fitness Eurasian sons (the most notable example of this being Eliot Rodger) but will also produce High Fitness Eurasian Daughters. Thus it seems that any marriage between a European and an Asian will have the most reproductive success if they produce only daughters. The same can be said for extremely tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered men. These men will go on to have High Fitness sons that are also tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered but will produce low fitness daughters that are lower in fitness that are tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered.

*'''Arabic''' - Chaddam, Abdul

*'''German''' - Justus

*'''Persian''' - Soroosh

*'''Greek''' - Andreas