Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Biological essentialism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One interesting development in the [[incelosphere]] in the late 2010s has been the rise of '''biological essentialism''' or '''gender essentialism'''. The claim that natural sexual instincts can't be overriden or are too hard to be overriden and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally sexually behave on a timescale shorter than millions of years of human evolution is a waste of time | One interesting development in the [[incelosphere]] in the late 2010s has been the rise of '''biological essentialism''' or '''gender essentialism'''. The claim that natural sexual instincts can't be overriden or are too hard to be overriden and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally sexually behave on a timescale shorter than millions of years of human evolution is a waste of time. '''Biological essentialism''' is basically what the [[blackpill]] promotes and generally promotes fatalism as incelospherians generally evaluate female nature as negative. | ||
The same people who promote this worldview also generally claim any attempt at social engineering a change in people natural sexuality, like [[hypergamy|female hypergamy]] or the sexual barter system, would require a totalitarian state. | The same people who promote this worldview also generally claim any attempt at social engineering a change in people natural sexuality, like [[hypergamy|female hypergamy]] or the sexual barter system, would require a totalitarian state. | ||