Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Wikipedia Incel article: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→History
m (→History) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The first Wikipedia article on Incel came about half-a-decade after the very beginnings of the self-identified community back in the late 90s. Wikipedia debuted on Jan. 15, 2001 and the Incel page was made on July 29, 2004.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20040729080456/http://en.wikipedia.org:80/wiki/Involuntary_celibacy</ref> Using archive.org, you can see that the idea of Incel was presented as a neutral term as well as gender-neutral. It was nicely unbiased, as how the Incel community had had it for so many years. For the next decade, incels could find [[IncelSupport]] through Wikipedia and see that it was a place for anyone. Here is an example from 2006: "Yes, hickoryridge, Cernan posted a link to this site on Wikipedia! He's doing a great job, isn't he?"<ref>http://z15.invisionfree.com/IncelSupport/ar/t42.htm</ref> | The first Wikipedia article on Incel came about half-a-decade after the very beginnings of the self-identified community back in the late 90s. Wikipedia debuted on Jan. 15, 2001 and the Incel page was made on July 29, 2004.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20040729080456/http://en.wikipedia.org:80/wiki/Involuntary_celibacy</ref> Using archive.org, you can see that the idea of Incel was presented as a neutral term as well as gender-neutral. It was nicely unbiased, as how the Incel community had had it for so many years. For the next decade, incels could find [[IncelSupport]] through Wikipedia and see that it was a place for anyone. Here is an example from 2006: "Yes, hickoryridge, Cernan posted a link to this site on Wikipedia! He's doing a great job, isn't he?"<ref>http://z15.invisionfree.com/IncelSupport/ar/t42.htm</ref> | ||
The incel article was deleted on 13 August 2015, and then again on 8 October 2015, and then finally on 29 December 2015, at which pointed it was also protected against re-creation. After the [[Toronto van attack]], [[GorillaWarfare]] re-created the article on 24 April 2018 and wrote most of its content over the course of 5 months as of mid-2018. On 15 June 2018, [[Courcelles]] semi-protected the article indefinitely against editing by non-autoconfirmed users. | The incel article was deleted on 13 August 2015, and then again on 8 October 2015, and then finally on 29 December 2015, at which pointed it was also protected against re-creation. After the [[Toronto van attack]], [[GorillaWarfare]] re-created the article against broad Wikipedia consensus on 24 April 2018 and wrote most of its content over the course of 5 months as of mid-2018. On 15 June 2018, [[Courcelles]] semi-protected the article indefinitely against editing by non-autoconfirmed users. | ||
[[GorillaWarfare]] owns (not just stewards) the incel Wikipedia page as of mid 2018 against wikipedia conduct policy, writing most of the article and constantly reverting unorganized registered users on technicalities about sources like the [[Donnelly Study]], but then allowing those sources to be used later as long as it was introduced by editors she liked. Her actions were alerted to Wikipedia's Arbcom team, which Gorilla had served as a member before, as well as the Wikipedia ANI board, which revealed that the only Wikipedia admins who cared about the incel article were explicitly and proudly [[anti-incel]], including former senior designer of the Wikimedia foundation [[Jorm]] and fellow Wikipedia admin [[Gamaliel]] who posted this [[misandry|misandrist]] and activist banner on Gorilla's talk page after the Arbcom submission was rejected for review. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GorillaWarfare&diff=858543044&oldid=858509008 diff] | [[GorillaWarfare]] owns (not just stewards) the incel Wikipedia page as of mid 2018 against wikipedia conduct policy, writing most of the article and constantly reverting unorganized registered users on technicalities about sources like the [[Donnelly Study]], but then allowing those sources to be used later as long as it was introduced by editors she liked. Her actions were alerted to Wikipedia's Arbcom team, which Gorilla had served as a member before, as well as the Wikipedia ANI board, which revealed that the only Wikipedia admins who cared about the incel article were explicitly and proudly [[anti-incel]], including former senior designer of the Wikimedia foundation [[Jorm]] and fellow Wikipedia admin [[Gamaliel]] who posted this [[misandry|misandrist]] and activist banner on Gorilla's talk page after the Arbcom submission was rejected for review. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GorillaWarfare&diff=858543044&oldid=858509008 diff] | ||