Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,928 bytes added ,  6 February 2021
No edit summary
Line 878: Line 878:


<span style="font-size:125%">'''Discussion:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Discussion:'''</span>
Although many [[blackpill|blackpilled]] incels that are primarily focused on [[Lookism|lookist discrimination]] maintain that autism in itself does not necessarily impede [[sexual market value]] or that it is only a 'death sentence' if you are not extraordinarily physically attractive, [[physiognomy|people with autism tend to bear clear physical signs of their condition]], similar to what is often found with other congenital disorders such as fetal alcohol syndrome and down syndrome (though the typical facial phenotype associated with both high and low functioning forms of ASD is generally nowhere as distinctive as the facial phenotypes associated with those specific conditions).


Although some incels on [[incels.co]] argue that autism does not damage [[sexual market value]] or that it is only a death sentence if you're [[Decile scale|sub8]], many people with autism tend to be physically unattractive and therefore often sub5.
Further, as sufferers of autism may generally possess a high level of [[mutation|mutational load]] in their phenotype due to the ''de novo'' mutations passed on from one of both of the parents or other pre-natal developmental disturbances likely playing some role in the genesis of the condition, it would follow that people with autism may be more susceptible to having small asymmetries or other minor, but still noticeable, physical defects resulting from pre-natal deviations from the typical 'developmental blueprint' that would be expected to reduce their overall physical attractiveness as well as the general 'quality' (in terms of fitness potential) of their phenotype.
 
Conversely, it could be that in some cases the [[physiognomy|physiognomic]] features associated with autism may not always be physically aversive, per se, as there have been anecdotal claims of (high functioning, at least) autism sometimes being associated with a unique, 'aristocratic' form of beauty since the disorders were first clinically described (Asperger, 1944).
 
However, even in the instances where autistic physiognomy is not overtly associated with a repulsive demeanor, it would be likely that people could still pick up something is 'off' instinctively from the distinctive facial physiognomy associated with the condition.
This peculiar physiognomy, combined with the flat affect, odd and rigid body postures, the general lack of grooming and apparent lack of drive to signal group affiliation or status via adopting fashionable or distinct forms of dress and other idiosyncratic social behaviors often endemic to autism may combine to induce people to be prone to shun, bully, or be flat out hostile towards people with autism, even at the stage of first acquaintance, well before there is any opportunity for the autist to engage in any social faux pas or the other kinds of more blatant eccentric behavior that are often called upon by 'experts' of autism to explain autistics frequent social isolation and tendency to be bullied, shunned, neglected and generally be low-status individuals that are often resigned to a life of social isolation and general penury and despair, as evinced by the very high suicide rates found among those with autism, particularly the 'high functioning' kind (who would be assumed to be those with the intellectual capacity to both grasp the bleak nature of their predicament and be able-minded and bodied enough to plan successfully carry out a suicide).


<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>

Navigation menu