Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Wikipedia Incel article: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→History
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[File:antiincel.png|full|center|<center></center>]] | [[File:antiincel.png|full|center|<center></center>]] | ||
The degree to which 'anti-incels' are open about their internal Wikipedia activism, shows an internal bias and perhaps an internal coordination (maybe not involving Gorilla) to keep the article non-NPOV that extends to the very top of Wikipedia, empowering wiki | The degree to which 'anti-incels' are open about their internal Wikipedia activism, shows an internal bias and perhaps an internal coordination (maybe not involving Gorilla) to keep the article non-NPOV that extends to the very top of Wikipedia, empowering [[anti-ince]] wiki editors to be open about their article bias. | ||
Wikipedia editor [[DaveDial]] threatened a topic ban on gender for editor [[thylacoop5]] despite not having admin privileges after [[thylacoop5]] made the following comment: "The following editors: [[Dave Dial]], [[Jorm]], and [[GorillaWarfare]] have recently suggested that this article should primarily focus on misogyny and violence and exclude other topics; with the rationale that this is where media coverage primarily focuses. By analogy, Islamism in the media primarily focuses on terrorism by groups such as ISIS/AL-Qaeda. Yet the islamism article has 14 subsections that do not mention militancy. Doesn't that show that there is a precedence on Wikipedia of broadening the focus?".<ref>http://wikirev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=2045&p=3711&hilit=incel#p3711</ref> | Wikipedia editor [[DaveDial]] threatened a topic ban on gender for editor [[thylacoop5]] despite not having admin privileges after [[thylacoop5]] made the following comment: "The following editors: [[Dave Dial]], [[Jorm]], and [[GorillaWarfare]] have recently suggested that this article should primarily focus on misogyny and violence and exclude other topics; with the rationale that this is where media coverage primarily focuses. By analogy, Islamism in the media primarily focuses on terrorism by groups such as ISIS/AL-Qaeda. Yet the islamism article has 14 subsections that do not mention militancy. Doesn't that show that there is a precedence on Wikipedia of broadening the focus?".<ref>http://wikirev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=2045&p=3711&hilit=incel#p3711</ref> | ||