Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
is someone here able to fix the fact that some section aren't making it onto table of contents. and the college women more sexually active section has an "equal sign" for some reason.
(Removed link that didn't belong there) |
(is someone here able to fix the fact that some section aren't making it onto table of contents. and the college women more sexually active section has an "equal sign" for some reason.) |
||
| Line 815: | Line 815: | ||
* Ramiro-Sánchez, Tamara; Ramiro, María Teresa; Bermúdez, María Paz; Buela-Casal, Gualberto (2018). "Sexism and sexual risk behavior in adolescents: Gender differences". International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 18 (3): 245–253. [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224861/pdf/main.pdf FullText]]. | * Ramiro-Sánchez, Tamara; Ramiro, María Teresa; Bermúdez, María Paz; Buela-Casal, Gualberto (2018). "Sexism and sexual risk behavior in adolescents: Gender differences". International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 18 (3): 245–253. [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224861/pdf/main.pdf FullText]]. | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Physically_attractive_people_convey_personality_traits_better_during_first_impressions">Physically attractive people convey personality traits better during first impressions</span>=== | |||
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Physically_attractive_people_convey_personality_traits_better_during_first_impressions|permalink]] | [[#tocPersonality|category: Personality]] | [[#tocPhysically_attractive_people_convey_personality_traits_better_during_first_impressions|table of contents]]</div> | |||
A University of British Columbia study discovered that people identify the personality traits of people who are physically attractive more accurately than others during short encounters. The study suggests people pay closer attention to people they find attractive, and is the latest scientific evidence of the advantages of perceived beauty. Previous research has discovered that individuals tend to find attractive people more intelligent, friendly and competent than others. The goal of the study was to determine whether a person's attractiveness impacts others' ability to discern their personality traits. For the study, researchers placed more than 75 male and female participants into groups of 5 to 11 people for 3-minute, one-on-one conversations. After each interaction, study participants rated partners on physical attractiveness and five major personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Each person also rated their own personality. Researchers were able to determine the accuracy of people's perceptions by comparing participants' ratings of others' personality traits with how individuals rated their own traits, adding that steps were taken to control for the positive bias that can occur in self-reporting. Despite an overall positive bias towards people they found attractive (as expected from previous research), study participants identified the "relative ordering" of personality traits of attractive participants more accurately than others, researchers found. "If people think Jane is beautiful, and she is very organized and somewhat generous, people will see her as more organized and generous than she actually is," says Professor Jeremy Biesanz. "Despite this bias, our study shows that people will also correctly discern the relative ordering of Jane's personality traits -- that she is more organized than generous -- better than others they find less attractive." The researchers say this is because people are motivated to pay closer attention to physically attractive people for many reasons, including curiosity, romantic interest or a desire for friendship or social status. "Not only do we judge books by their covers, we read the ones with beautiful covers much closer than others," says Biesanz, noting the study focused on first impressions of personality in social situations, like cocktail parties. Although participants largely agreed on group members' attractiveness, the study reaffirms that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Participants were best at identifying the personalities of people they found attractive, regardless of whether others found them attractive. According to Biesanz, scientists spent considerable efforts a half-century prior to the study seeking to determine what types of people perceive personality best, to largely mixed results. With this study, the team chose to study this longstanding question from another direction, he says, focusing not on who judges personality best, but rather whether some people's personalities are better perceived. | |||
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Discussion:'''</span> | |||
Although many people will argue that having a good personality compensates for being physically ugly, research says this isn't exactly true. | |||
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span> | |||
* G. L. Lorenzo, J. C. Biesanz, L. J. Human. What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood: Physical Attractiveness and Accuracy in First Impressions of Personality. Psychological Science, 2010; 21 (12): 1777 DOI: 10.1177/0956797610388048. [[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797610388048 Abstract]]. | |||
==<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:40px; font-weight: normal;">''Mental''</span>== | ==<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:40px; font-weight: normal;">''Mental''</span>== | ||