6,453
edits
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
===Infidelity physiognomy=== | ===Infidelity physiognomy=== | ||
Foo et al. (2019) found that women relied on men's attractiveness, facial masculinity, and overall perceived trustworthiness to attempt to determine their likelihood of committing infidelity, however of these traits only facial masculinity predicted ''actual'' infidelity related behaviors above chance. This effect however, was weak, with only 14.1–18.0% of raters being able to accurately gauge men's infidelity related behaviors above chance.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26244776/</ref> There was no such effect found for women, despite men being able to judge infidelity related behaviors above chance in other men. Earlier research, found that men could only make above accuracy judgements of infidelity when presented with two women, one of whom had committed infidelity several times in the past compared to who had not.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26244776/</ref> | *Foo et al. (2019) found that women relied on men's attractiveness, facial masculinity, and overall perceived trustworthiness to attempt to determine their likelihood of committing infidelity, however of these traits only facial masculinity predicted ''actual'' infidelity related behaviors above chance. This effect however, was weak, with only 14.1–18.0% of raters being able to accurately gauge men's infidelity related behaviors above chance.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26244776/</ref> There was no such effect found for women, despite men being able to judge infidelity related behaviors above chance in other men. Earlier research, found that men could only make above accuracy judgements of infidelity when presented with two women, one of whom had committed infidelity several times in the past compared to who had not.<ref>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26244776/</ref> | ||
===Leadership physiognomy=== | ===Leadership physiognomy=== |
edits