Looksmax.org: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
31 bytes added ,  2 July 2020
Line 34: Line 34:
==Relations with [[incels.co]]==
==Relations with [[incels.co]]==


Looksmax.me has two types of members: those who come from [[incels.co]] and those who directly discovered looksmax.me . On September 10th, 2018, Stormlitaqua (original [[incels.co]] member) created a thread called " [JFL] Advice on finding a virgin girl?" [1]. New users began flooding the thread with non-blackpilled advice and Stormlitaqua soon found himself discussing against the whole thread. Since then, looksmax.me isn't taken as a blackpilled website by the members of [[incels.co]] and more clashes have ocurred between Stormlitaqua and Nibba and his pals. <br><br>Currently, despite the big amount of narcisistic posters who brag about their success with women, arccording to several polls 60% of users are virgin.
Looksmax.me has two types of members: those who come from [[incels.co]] and those who directly discovered looksmax.me or come from [[PSL]] community . On September 10th, 2018, Stormlitaqua (original [[incels.co]] member) created a thread called " [JFL] Advice on finding a virgin girl?" [1]. New users began flooding the thread with non-blackpilled advice and Stormlitaqua soon found himself discussing against the whole thread. Since then, looksmax.me isn't taken as a blackpilled website by the members of [[incels.co]] and more clashes have ocurred between Stormlitaqua and Nibba and his pals. <br><br>Currently, despite the big amount of narcisistic posters who brag about their success with women, arccording to several polls 60% of users are virgin.


In the case of [[knajjd v. Zesto]], it was clarified in late November 2018 that (1) statements made on Looksmax.me that contradict statements made on incels.co can be used as evidence of LARPing; and (2) disparaging comments made on Looksmax.me against incels.co mods can negate any expressions of humble contrition expressed in incels.co ban appeals; and (3) users can be sanctioned for linking to Looksmax.me posts on incels.co at the request of banned users
In the case of [[knajjd v. Zesto]], it was clarified in late November 2018 that (1) statements made on Looksmax.me that contradict statements made on incels.co can be used as evidence of LARPing; and (2) disparaging comments made on Looksmax.me against incels.co mods can negate any expressions of humble contrition expressed in incels.co ban appeals; and (3) users can be sanctioned for linking to Looksmax.me posts on incels.co at the request of banned users
745

edits

Navigation menu