Mike Crumplar: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
963 bytes added ,  21 April 2020
Line 5: Line 5:
==Other views==
==Other views==
He believes the media overestimates the white makeup of incel forums, and the propensity of non-whites to act 'hateful'.  He also your average self-proclaimed incels generally fits the police profile of a potential lone-wolf terrorist.<ref>https://countere.com/home/mikecrumplarincels</ref>  He further states he believes society creates what most people know as incels rather than any conspiratorial force or forum.
He believes the media overestimates the white makeup of incel forums, and the propensity of non-whites to act 'hateful'.  He also your average self-proclaimed incels generally fits the police profile of a potential lone-wolf terrorist.<ref>https://countere.com/home/mikecrumplarincels</ref>  He further states he believes society creates what most people know as incels rather than any conspiratorial force or forum.
He had this to say about Incel Wiki and incel forums:
{{cquote|This science always bends around to reinforce their own suffering—every bit of knowledge contains the pang of hopeless longing, always reminding them of what they do not have, that they will never fuck. It is a pornographic encyclopedia of sex by people who will never experience it. 
Many of the incels’ insights are not actually that wrong in and of themselves. It is that they are pieced together in such a way that it always turns out wrong in the big picture. They often make fascinating, brilliant, truly literary insights into everyday life, insights that cut beyond the chatter of “normie” liberal bourgeois ideology. They catalogue the ways that people are always lying to themselves, that social norms are elaborate alienating systems of deceptions, and so on. They often seem so lucid, so close to understanding everything, before fading back into conspiratorial psychosis. }}


==See Also==
==See Also==
25,837

edits

Navigation menu