Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Good genes hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Other modern promoters
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Other modern promoters== | ==Other modern promoters== | ||
Blackpillers take a view of sexual selection similar to modern (but not traditional) American eugenicists such as [[Edward Dutton]]. Some, but not all, feminists also promote the good genes hypothesis by insinuating that sexual selection outside of patriarchy is a moral and rational sorter of good and bad genes. Feminists more often take issue with Darwin in general though<ref>https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/woman-who-tried-take-down-darwin-180967146/</ref> | Blackpillers take a view of sexual selection similar to modern (but not traditional) American eugenicists such as [[Edward Dutton]]. Some, but not all, feminists also promote the good genes hypothesis by insinuating that sexual selection outside of patriarchy is a moral and rational sorter of good and bad genes. Feminists more often take issue with Darwin in general though,<ref>https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/woman-who-tried-take-down-darwin-180967146/</ref> so these overtures are infrequent and often passively expressed in arguments, if at all. | ||
==Alternative beliefs== | ==Alternative beliefs== | ||