Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Good genes hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Good genes hypothesis''' is the belief that the choosy sex in a species sexually selects those with genes most beneficial to long term survival of the species. [[Blackpiller]]s often promote this view of humans, moreso than the [[fisherian runaway|belief that female choice has become maladaptive]], usually by calling incels [[subhuman]] or genetically inferior because of being rejected by women. And then rejecting arguments to the contrary as [[cope]]. This | The '''Good genes hypothesis''' is the belief that the choosy sex in a species sexually selects those with genes most beneficial to long term survival of the species. [[Blackpiller]]s often promote this view of humans, moreso than the [[fisherian runaway|belief that female choice has become maladaptive]], usually by calling incels [[subhuman]] or genetically inferior because of being rejected by women. And then rejecting arguments to the contrary as [[cope]]. This is further evidenced by blackpiller advocation for suicide for incels, eugenics, or social Darwinism. Blackpillers take a view of sexual selection similar to modern (but not traditional) American eugenicists such as Edward Dutton. | ||
==Alternative beliefs== | ==Alternative beliefs== | ||