Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Scientific Blackpill (Summary): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
=== Looks may not be everything === | === Looks may not be everything === | ||
<div id="messages" style="float: right"></div> | |||
[[File:OkCupid_Female_Incoming_Messages_by_Attractiveness.png|right|300px|thumb|Attractiveness vs incoming messages from OkCupid. The distribution for men likely looks similar, but with men receiving 6-7 times fewer messages. [[Scientific Blackpill#Mental_disorders_significantly_reduce_male_fertility.2C_substantially_more_than_they_do_for_women|More information]].]] | [[File:OkCupid_Female_Incoming_Messages_by_Attractiveness.png|right|300px|thumb|Attractiveness vs incoming messages from OkCupid. The distribution for men likely looks similar, but with men receiving 6-7 times fewer messages. [[Scientific Blackpill#Mental_disorders_significantly_reduce_male_fertility.2C_substantially_more_than_they_do_for_women|More information]].]] | ||
| Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
Correlations between looks, height, income, masculinity and sex partner count are, however, only weak,<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-006-9075-x</ref><ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474704915604563</ref><ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2011.587758</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Across_91_studies.2C_bodily_masculinity_was_predictive_of_men.27s_mating_and_reproductive_success</ref> meaning looks are unlikely to explain most inceldom except, perhaps, for extremely unattractive individuals. | Correlations between looks, height, income, masculinity and sex partner count are, however, only weak,<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-006-9075-x</ref><ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474704915604563</ref><ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2011.587758</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Across_91_studies.2C_bodily_masculinity_was_predictive_of_men.27s_mating_and_reproductive_success</ref> meaning looks are unlikely to explain most inceldom except, perhaps, for extremely unattractive individuals. | ||
Still, looks likely make life easier and open doors. Correlations regarding looks and ''copulation opportunities'' are much higher than for partner counts. E.g. on OkCupid, rated attractiveness and incoming messages were correlated at around r = .5 (see graph | Still, looks likely make life easier and open doors. Correlations regarding looks and ''copulation opportunities'' are much higher than for partner counts. E.g. on OkCupid, rated attractiveness and incoming messages were correlated at around r = .5 ([[#messages|see graph]]). The same effect can be found with regards to social status, where the correlations with copulation opportunities are strong, but weak for partner counts.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref> | ||
It should also be noted that men are seemingly bad at accurately judging the own looks.<ref>http://doi.org/10.2307/3033724</ref><ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sjop.12631</ref> [[Demographics of inceldom]] suggest that there is a trend toward less sex for both men and women have less sex, which is accompanied by a trend towards later marriage, i.e. less strictly enforced monogamy. | It should also be noted that men are seemingly bad at accurately judging the own looks.<ref>http://doi.org/10.2307/3033724</ref><ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sjop.12631</ref> [[Demographics of inceldom]] suggest that there is a trend toward less sex for both men and women have less sex, which is accompanied by a trend towards later marriage, i.e. less strictly enforced monogamy. | ||