Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Environmentalism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
One could argue environmentalism is a fundamentally conservative position, making today's politics a bit odd. | One could argue environmentalism is a fundamentally conservative position, making today's politics a bit odd. | ||
==Generational conflict== | == Generational conflict == | ||
Even though the claim that the environment needs to be maintained for human survival has some merit to it, to avoid a generational conflict between younger and older generations, there is a trade-off to be made between ensuring current social harmony and creating a livable future of the offspring. This trade-off does not have a simple solution though due to the risks involved. Perhaps this conflict could be dismissed due to the uncertainties involved. | |||
Even though the claim that the environment needs to be maintained for human survival has some merit to it, to avoid a generational conflict between younger and older generations, there is a trade-off to be made between ensuring current social harmony and creating a livable future of the offspring. This trade-off does not have a simple solution though due to the risks involved. Perhaps this conflict could be dismissed due to the uncertainties involved and the fact that the next generation will benefit from the prosperity that is being accumulated in the meanwhile. | |||
== Growth vs environmentalism == | |||
Much of social harmony appears to depend on economic growth as it provides a strong incentive to get more stuff from newly created capital rather than from other people. Without growth, things tend to turn into zero-sum games instead, meaning whenever someone wants more he has to get it from others others, if necessary by force (e.g. theft, wars etc.). Transitioning to a post-growth economy will inevitably risk this and thus has the tendency to divide people. Once it is socially acceptable to put high priority on the planet to be preserved, it is easy to conclude that the world is overpopulated and hence authoritarian leaders may decide for drastic measures of decimating the population (for their own automated paradise of course). | |||
Growth is synonymous with carbon emissions environmental degradation until cleaner energy sources are deployed/discovered. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||