Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Romantic idealization: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Origin
(→Origin) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
===Origin=== | ===Written Origin=== | ||
While one may argue if romantic love has an origin or not, the origin of recorded analysis of romantic love is often cited as beginning in Medieval Times.<ref>Beigel, 1951</ref><ref>Hunt, 1959</ref> However, closer analysis reveals romantic love being discussed in Plato's symposium in 360BC.<ref>https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/831/1.0053733/1 AN EXISTENTIAL-PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ROMANTIC LOVE by Karen Lecovin</ref> Here Plato denigrates romantic love as not 'true' love, due to it being transitory. | While one may argue if romantic love has an actual origin or not, the origin of recorded analysis of romantic love is often cited as beginning in Medieval Times.<ref>Beigel, 1951</ref><ref>Hunt, 1959</ref> However, closer analysis reveals romantic love being discussed in Plato's symposium in 360BC.<ref>https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/831/1.0053733/1 AN EXISTENTIAL-PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ROMANTIC LOVE by Karen Lecovin</ref> Here Plato denigrates romantic love as not 'true' love, due to it being transitory. | ||
===Written Conceptualization=== | ===Written Conceptualization=== | ||