Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Romantic idealization: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→History
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
The origin of romantic love is often cited as beginning with the 'courtly love' practices of [[chivalry]] in Medieval Times.<ref>Beigel, 1951</ref><ref>Hunt, 1959</ref> However, closer analysis reveals romantic love being discussed in Plato's symposium in 360BC.<ref>https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/831/1.0053733/1 AN EXISTENTIAL-PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ROMANTIC LOVE by Karen Lecovin</ref> | The origin of romantic love is often cited as beginning with the 'courtly love' practices of [[chivalry]] in Medieval Times.<ref>Beigel, 1951</ref><ref>Hunt, 1959</ref> However, closer analysis reveals romantic love being discussed in Plato's symposium in 360BC.<ref>https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/831/1.0053733/1 AN EXISTENTIAL-PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ROMANTIC LOVE by Karen Lecovin</ref> | ||
Modern notions of romance | In 12th century France, Troubadour poetry provided a framework for romantic love. Back then, romantic love ''only'' meant extramarital love. IE long-distance pining for someone who you are not married to. Marriage was seen as a practical affair where superiors were in charge, whereas in romantic love women (rather than men) were in full control and the love was to be driven by passion.<ref>https://www.ancient.eu/Courtly_Love/</ref> These romances were not intended to be materialized. | ||
Modern notions of romance are extended into marriage, but retain the chivalric practice of man-proving-himself-to-woman. This occurs through the synthesis Greek idea of sexuality as a spiritual journey,the Puritan idea of love being essential to marriage.<ref>https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/831/1.0053733/1 AN EXISTENTIAL-PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ROMANTIC LOVE by Karen Lecovin</ref> | |||
==Relationships without romance== | ==Relationships without romance== | ||