Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Editing rules, account creation, and other info: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Editing rules, account creation, and other info (view source)
Revision as of 17:03, 30 January 2020
, 30 January 2020→Guidelines
(→Editing Rules: clearing up possible confusion) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
All in all, if you just write descriptive content about subjects relating to inceldom, you will probably be fine. | All in all, if you just write descriptive content about subjects relating to inceldom, you will probably be fine. | ||
*Incel Wiki is inclusionist, not delitionist. We try to preserve other people's writing. If you absolutely hate a page or have a completely different view, you can move the text of the page to another page, split controversial pages into two pages (not recommended for large articles), or qualify disagreement in the article itself by saying "x (me) views y as this", however "z views y as this" (more recommended for large articles). | *Incel Wiki is inclusionist, not delitionist. We try to preserve other people's entertaining, informative, and pro-incel writing. If you absolutely hate a page or have a completely different view, you can move the text of the page to another page, split controversial pages into two pages (not recommended for large articles), or qualify disagreement in the article itself by saying "x (me) views y as this", however "z views y as this" (more recommended for large articles). | ||
*We are here to have fun, not to indoctrinate people, or to engage in a "war of ideas" with other writers. As soon as this isn't fun it's not worth doing. | *We are here to have fun, not to indoctrinate people, or to engage in a "war of ideas" with other writers. As soon as this isn't fun it's not worth doing. | ||
*Humor, readability, stereotype-busting, entertainment, and accuracy are all important. Armchair psychology, hypotheses, original thought etc are all fine as well, as long as it's fun to read and not just assertions that are malicious towards incels. | *Humor, readability, stereotype-busting, entertainment, and accuracy are all important. Armchair psychology, hypotheses, original thought etc are all fine as well, as long as it's fun to read and not just assertions that are malicious towards incels. | ||