Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Sexual Utopia in Power (book): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
He then goes on to criticize the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the objectification of men and encourages women to take a callous and instrumental view of men. | He then goes on to criticize the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the objectification of men and encourages women to take a callous and instrumental view of men. | ||
He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill|redpilled]] about women's nature and avoiding long term engagements with women, seeking instead to pump-and dump. He then argues that what women consider [[Creepiness|sexual harrasment]] is merely women resisting traditional courtship behavior from [[Creepiness|unattractive men.]] He ominously states that this hostility towards men will result in increased violence and victimization of women by men disabused of their chivalrous conditioning and the dissipation of men's natural tendency to [[White knight|protect women from violence.]] | He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill|redpilled]] about women's nature and avoiding long term engagements with women, seeking instead to pump-and dump. He then argues that what women consider [[Creepiness|sexual harrasment]] is merely women resisting traditional [[courtship]] behavior from [[Creepiness|unattractive men.]] He ominously states that this hostility towards men will result in increased violence and victimization of women by men disabused of their chivalrous conditioning and the dissipation of men's natural tendency to [[White knight|protect women from violence.]] | ||
He then goes on the argue that the sexual revolution has failed in its touted goal of ending sexual frustration by promoting 'free love'. He points out due to the natural human birth ratio producing more male offspring then female and women's natural tendency towards [[hypergamy]], that allowing women unimpeded sexual license will lead to the sexual dynamics of the great apes becoming apparent in human society, with the '[[Chad|top men']] monopolizing the majority of women. He argues this results in a vicious spiral due to the female mammalian instinct of mate-choice copying ( pre-selection) resulting in the cementing of a polygynous status quo. | He then goes on the argue that the sexual revolution has failed in its touted goal of ending sexual frustration by promoting 'free love'. He points out due to the natural human birth ratio producing more male offspring then female and women's natural tendency towards [[hypergamy]], that allowing women unimpeded sexual license will lead to the sexual dynamics of the great apes becoming apparent in human society, with the '[[Chad|top men']] monopolizing the majority of women. He argues this results in a vicious spiral due to the female mammalian instinct of mate-choice copying ( pre-selection) resulting in the cementing of a polygynous status quo. | ||