Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Muscle theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Studies confirming muscle theory
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Studies confirming muscle theory== | ==Studies confirming muscle theory== | ||
According to a study by UCLA, muscle-bound men report almost 3 times as many sexual partners as men without a muscular physique.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20160430064307/http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/Lift-More-Weights-Get-More-Mates-8069?RelNum=8069</ref> | According to a study by UCLA, muscle-bound men report almost 3 times as many sexual partners as men without a muscular physique.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20160430064307/http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/Lift-More-Weights-Get-More-Mates-8069?RelNum=8069</ref> | ||
According to academics Aaron Sell, Aaron W. Lukazsweski and Michael Townsley in | According to academics Aaron Sell, Aaron W. Lukazsweski and Michael Townsley in another peer-reviewed study, '''cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness'''.<ref>https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819</ref> In the study women were asked to rate photos of men, and while height and leanness played a role, strength played the largest role in which pictures women picked. In fact, the women never chose weaker men, and there was no nuance to the results. Zero of the 160 women surveyed showed a statistical preference for weaker men.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/12/12/women-rate-the-strongest-men-as-the-most-attractive-study-finds/</ref> | ||
==LFA== | ==LFA== | ||