6,351
edits
Talk:NEET: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::Just the way you worded it the first time on the page made it seem like it was a major criticism of the study, when I really don't think many such men exist (male players who don't settle)> But you are free to reword it back to however you like, I don't have a huge opinion on this. The times I equated non-singledom to inceldom was more about pointing out the lack of non-players single-by-choice[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) | ::Just the way you worded it the first time on the page made it seem like it was a major criticism of the study, when I really don't think many such men exist (male players who don't settle)> But you are free to reword it back to however you like, I don't have a huge opinion on this. The times I equated non-singledom to inceldom was more about pointing out the lack of non-players single-by-choice[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) | ||
::Changed it to clarify the study, I largely agree with you that male players are rare (especially at older ages), so splitting hairs over this isn't really productive. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 20:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC) | ::Changed it to clarify the study, I largely agree with you that male players are rare (especially at older ages), so splitting hairs over this isn't really productive. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 20:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)] | ||
::Also, are you aware of Besaglia mentioning the pathologizing of unemployment by psychiatry? Might be good to add if he directly talked about this subject.[[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 20:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC) | |||