Love shy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
18 bytes added ,  21 December 2019
Line 130: Line 130:
Another point of criticism may be that love-shyness considers confidence in sexual matters as an isolated issue. Within a more general framework of human [[dominance hierarchy|dominance behavior]], the inability to court a female is probably mostly related to social status, e.g. social status explains 62% of the variance in copulation opportunities for men<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref>  
Another point of criticism may be that love-shyness considers confidence in sexual matters as an isolated issue. Within a more general framework of human [[dominance hierarchy|dominance behavior]], the inability to court a female is probably mostly related to social status, e.g. social status explains 62% of the variance in copulation opportunities for men<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref>  
and likely plays a role for women too.
and likely plays a role for women too.
Love-shy individuals likely often lack the required amount of social status that would admit them to confidently lead a relationship and overcome women's reluctance to have sex, and not fear shaming in case they turn out to be a failure in sexual matters. Low status may be due to any number of flaws in physical appearance ([[ugliness|beauty]], [[fatcel|overweight]]), behavior (autism, lack of confidence) or economic standing, based on which human dominance hierarchies are decided. This is aggravated by [[feminism|feminists]] outright shaming men who confidently and forcefully approach women and forcing them to be [[nice guy|nice]], even though most women seem to prefer [[rape#Rape_fantasies|being dominated]]. A main limiting factor in men's sexual and social success may hence be attributable to a rise of social norms that hinder men in their assertion of dominance, a point that [[Jordan Peterson]] repeatedly raised.
Love-shy individuals likely often lack the required amount of social status that would admit them to confidently lead a relationship and overcome women's reluctance to have sex, and not fear shaming in case they turn out to be a failure in sexual matters. Low status may be due to any number of flaws in physical appearance ([[ugliness|beauty]], [[fatcel|overweight]]), behavior ([[autism]], [[fuckupcel|lack of competence]]) or economic standing, based on which human dominance hierarchies are decided. This is aggravated by [[feminism|feminists]] outright shaming men who confidently and forcefully approach women and forcing them to be [[nice guy|nice]], even though most women seem to prefer [[rape#Rape_fantasies|being dominated]]. A main limiting factor in men's sexual and social success may hence be attributable to a rise of social norms that hinder men in their assertion of dominance, a point that [[Jordan Peterson]] repeatedly raised.


==Press attention==
==Press attention==
17,538

edits

Navigation menu