2,849
edits
Female privilege: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<blockquote>Women and children first!</blockquote> | <blockquote>Women and children first!</blockquote> | ||
is an expression of such phenomenon along with the rest of [[white knight|white knight culture]]. | is an expression of such phenomenon along with the rest of [[white knight|white knight culture]]. | ||
==Immunity to sex crimes== | |||
For most if western history, the concept of a "sex crime" was an exclusively male crime. In fact, the notion of a "rapist" was in fact so male, that you literally needed a penis to do it. If you didn't have a penis, then the word ''rape'' by definition didn't appy to you. In fact, British law, per the Sexual Offences Act 2003 continues to define rape as a male only crime, except the gender-specific references are downplayed to hide the blatant androphobia. This manhating law goes as follows: "A person (A) commits an offence if (a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis (and) B does not consent to the penetration". Have you noticed the pronoun "HE", i.e. a male pronoun? Have you noticed the necessity of a penis? Have you noticed that the notion of "forced to penetrate" is absent from this law? | |||
English law is written so that even if a woman was to pin down a 13 year old boy, handcuff him to a bed, pull his pants down and forcefully have intercourse with him, she would fall outside of the bracket of rape. She wouldn't be a rapist. | |||
There's a famous proverb that says "with power comes responsibility". To all the feminists who push for equality and an increase in female power, there is a strange absence for a concurrent increase in female accountability. In a nutshell, women want legal, political and social power, but they want none of the associated responsibility. | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||