6,353
edits
Homocel hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Evidence
mNo edit summary |
m (→Evidence) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Peripheralized males engaging in homosexual behavior (grooming, penis display and touching, and sodomy) can be also found in various primate species, and has been observed in all-male societies of pirates, as well as in vulnerable British men transported to Australia as punishment for crimes. | Peripheralized males engaging in homosexual behavior (grooming, penis display and touching, and sodomy) can be also found in various primate species, and has been observed in all-male societies of pirates, as well as in vulnerable British men transported to Australia as punishment for crimes. | ||
Homoerotically reinforced alliances between socially peripheralized males and males with higher social status are also evidenced in reports of working-class England at the turn of the century, Australian Aborigines, tribes in Melanesia and Papua, New Guinea, contemporary Thailand and Edo era Japan.<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref><ref>https://soranews24.com/2015/01/21/edo-era-samurai-were-pretty-gay/</ref> | Homoerotically reinforced alliances between socially peripheralized males and males with higher social status are also evidenced in reports of working-class England at the turn of the century, Australian Aborigines, tribes in Melanesia and Papua (though homosexuality in some Melanesian cultures often has a ritualized, religious element<ref>https://www.jstor.org/stable/646389?seq=1</ref>, New Guinea, contemporary Thailand, and Edo era Japan.<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref><ref>https://soranews24.com/2015/01/21/edo-era-samurai-were-pretty-gay/</ref> | ||
Muscarella suggested peripheralized men (incels) can establish sexually intimate social ties with sexually frustrated men of higher social standing, to partially re-gain their access to resources and potentially restoring some amount of [[reproductive success]] (and hence be adaptive behavior).<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> | Muscarella suggested peripheralized men (incels) can establish sexually intimate social ties with sexually frustrated men of higher social standing, to partially re-gain their access to resources and potentially restoring some amount of [[reproductive success]] (and hence be adaptive behavior).<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The principle of sexual frustration may be relevant to sexual deviance in general. After all, being denied access to "normal" sex, likely pushes individuals to consider alternative ways to satisfy their sexual needs. In fact one robustly observes higher incidence rates of rape, when prostitution is limited.<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01541945</ref> | The principle of sexual frustration may be relevant to sexual deviance in general. After all, being denied access to "normal" sex, likely pushes individuals to consider alternative ways to satisfy their sexual needs. In fact one robustly observes higher incidence rates of rape, when prostitution is limited.<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01541945</ref> | ||
Since [[autism|autists]] overwhelmingly are socially excluded, have low social status and frequently experience inceldom, the homocel theory may explain why autists are 10x more likely to be homosexual.<ref>http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/bjprcpsych/201/2/116.full.pdf</ref> | Since [[autism|autists]] overwhelmingly are socially excluded, have low social status and frequently experience inceldom, the homocel theory may explain why autists are 10x more likely to be homosexual, or [[trannymaxxing|transition]] to another gender (typically female).<ref>http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/bjprcpsych/201/2/116.full.pdf</ref> | ||
== Anecdotal evidence == | == Anecdotal evidence == | ||