2,849
edits
Libido: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Coccyx fallacy
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
===Coccyx fallacy=== | ===Coccyx fallacy=== | ||
Overall, the [[coccyx | Overall, the [[coccyx fallacy]] discusses the trope, which isn't uncommon, that sex is dispensable, nad that sex isn't a right. | ||
There are many people who believe that sex is dispensable, although these same people are aware that using the term "dispensable" itself is unlikely to garner sympathy, as it seems too tactless and forthright. As such, these people use less blunt terminology to convey their thoughts. Instead they'll use idioms such as "noone has a right to sex", "sex is a privilege", "you won't die if you don't have sex", or "so what if you're having a dry spell, get over it". | There are many people who believe that sex is dispensable, although these same people are aware that using the term "dispensable" itself is unlikely to garner sympathy, as it seems too tactless and forthright. As such, these people use less blunt terminology to convey their thoughts. Instead they'll use idioms such as "noone has a right to sex", "sex is a privilege", "you won't die if you don't have sex", or "so what if you're having a dry spell, get over it". | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Test for yourself. The next time you see someone trivializing the notion of sexual inactivity, check out the author's profile, handle, or pen-name. It is almost always a feminine name. | Test for yourself. The next time you see someone trivializing the notion of sexual inactivity, check out the author's profile, handle, or pen-name. It is almost always a feminine name. | ||
=== Cross-cultural differences === | === Cross-cultural differences === | ||