Fisherian runaway: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,149 bytes added ,  25 November 2019
Line 67: Line 67:


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
===Political dimension===
Topics related to sexual selection are subject to political controversy, especially since female scientists are involved (or their [[white knight|white knights]]) and they do not want to portrait female choice or behavior as maladaptive.
Further, considering women's secondary sexual characteristics as means to conspicuously advertise themselves implies that they signal nubility, which however occurs long before reaching legal age.
Teenager pregnancies incur a significant cost in modern culture and any theories to this extent are prone to be shunned politically.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven_Gaulin/publication/332968715_Evidence_supporting_nubility_and_reproducitve_value_as_the_key_to_human_female_physical_attractiveness/links/5cd870fb458515712ea67628/Evidence-supporting-nubility-and-reproducitve-value-as-the-key-to-human-female-physical-attractiveness.pdf</ref> Arguably, female herd mentality and hysteria has contributed to creating a moral panic about these matters.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)#90.25_of_victims_of_workplace_mass_hysteria_are_women</ref>
===Good genes===
===Good genes===


17,538

edits

Navigation menu