2,359
edits
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
== Sexy son hypothesis == | == Sexy son hypothesis == | ||
The sexy son | The sexy son hypothesis in evolutionary biology and sexual selection—proposed by Ronald Fisher in 1930—states that a female's ideal mate choice among potential mates is one whose genes will produce male offspring with the best chance of [[reproductive success.]] The type of men whom achieve the most reproductive success depends on the social system. For example, a sexy son in a patriarchy will look extraordinarily different than a sexy son in a matriarchy. | ||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4bGF17cN_8|frame|}} | |||
Of course men also more readily copulate with beautiful women, but men have less [[Bateman's principle|parental investment]] and hence do not need to care as much about such considerations. Further, women's ability to provide does not matter nearly as much as men's and women also largely lack this ability (at least they did before the invention of modern welfare states). Hence, women's behavior of disregarding the ability to provide merely at the benefit of better looking offspring has much more drastic implications, such as the species going extinct because the men are ironically, not healthy enough to produce the over-exaggerated beautiful traits the women are attracted too. | |||
Since having sexy sons stems from women choosing the mate they are most physically attracted too, the male equivalent is doing the same thing (resulting in sexy daughters). Males choosing women they were most physically attracted too has been the norm for most groups of people thru out human history. | Since having sexy sons stems from women choosing the mate they are most physically attracted too, the male equivalent is doing the same thing (resulting in sexy daughters). Males choosing women they were most physically attracted too has been the norm for most groups of people thru out human history. |