2,359
edits
Golden ratio: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
All of that suggests [[Pretty Boy]]s and by extension [[cutecel]]'s are "genetic flukes" or "mistakes", essentially by products of [[Betabux|non dominant looking men]] reproducing with women whom have golden ratio faces (conventionally beautiful women). | All of that suggests [[Pretty Boy]]s and by extension [[cutecel]]'s are "genetic flukes" or "mistakes", essentially by products of [[Betabux|non dominant looking men]] reproducing with women whom have golden ratio faces (conventionally beautiful women). | ||
== Further criticism == | |||
Studies by psychologists, starting with Gustav Fechner c. 1876,[103] have been devised to test the idea that the golden ratio plays a role in human perception of beauty. While Fechner found a preference for rectangle ratios centered on the golden ratio, later attempts to carefully test such a hypothesis have been, at best, inconclusive | |||
Some specific proportions in the bodies of many animals (including humans)[98][99] and parts of the shells of mollusks[3] are often claimed to be in the golden ratio. There is a large variation in the real measures of these elements in specific individuals, however, and the proportion in question is often significantly different from the golden ratio | |||
but sometimes with the claim that each new chamber is golden-proportioned relative to the previous one.[100] However, measurements of nautilus shells do not support this <ref>claim.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio#Disputed_observations</ref | |||
Others argue any attractive proportions associated with the golden ratio are by pure coincidence. <ref>https://www.fastcompany.com/3044877/the-golden-ratio-designs-biggest-myth</ref | |||
{{Lookism}} | {{Lookism}} | ||
{{Behavioralism}} | {{Behavioralism}} | ||