Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:High-EQ personality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Seems to be a framework eerily suited to a Chinese style nightmare 'social credit' system based on whatever is the norm at the time. The only personality traits researchers seem to have a grasp on is extroversion/introversion and the rest just seems open to speculation. And speculation is fine on the wiki. I have a very low opinion on whatever is currently academic psychological consensus about anything. These fields have a history of being overconfident about horribly wrong theses, that never has really ended. One would probably have to really go beyond an abstract and really parse individual studies to get any useful information in the psychological field I would think. [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | Seems to be a framework eerily suited to a Chinese style nightmare 'social credit' system based on whatever is the norm at the time. The only personality traits researchers seem to have a grasp on is extroversion/introversion and the rest just seems open to speculation. And speculation is fine on the wiki. I have a very low opinion on whatever is currently academic psychological consensus about anything. These fields have a history of being overconfident about horribly wrong theses, that never has really ended. One would probably have to really go beyond an abstract and really parse individual studies to get any useful information in the psychological field I would think. [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | ||