Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:High-EQ personality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Arguments about Big 5 vs. GFP just seems to be political arguments as to whether or not to frame 'bad personality' in terms of unidimensional social effectiveness or not. The GFP seems like a pretty awful framework for those who want the psychiatric business out of politics. Seems to be a framework eerily suited to a Chinese style nightmare 'social credit' system. The only personality traits researchers seem to have a grasp on is extroversion/introversion and the rest just seems open to speculation. | :Arguments about Big 5 vs. GFP just seems to be political arguments as to whether or not to frame 'bad personality' in terms of unidimensional social effectiveness or not. The GFP seems like a pretty awful framework for those who want the psychiatric business out of politics. Seems to be a framework eerily suited to a Chinese style nightmare 'social credit' system. The only personality traits researchers seem to have a grasp on is extroversion/introversion and the rest just seems open to speculation. | ||
And speculation is fine on the wiki. I have a very low opinion on whatever is currently academic psychological consensus about anything. These fields have a history of being overconfident about horribly wrong theses, that never has really ended. [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | ||