Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:High-EQ personality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:From the incel's point of view, the main relevance is that these high-EQ girls may seem like BPDs at first because of their charisma and consequent popularity, but it's going to be basically impossible to fuck them, in contrast to BPD girls. The other thing is, high-EQ girls are going to be less likely to be bunny-boilers because they don't have that same impulsiveness overriding their conscientiousness [[Special:Contributions/2601:5CD:C200:9BE0:DD87:D7DF:595F:1BD7|2601:5CD:C200:9BE0:DD87:D7DF:595F:1BD7]] 23:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | :From the incel's point of view, the main relevance is that these high-EQ girls may seem like BPDs at first because of their charisma and consequent popularity, but it's going to be basically impossible to fuck them, in contrast to BPD girls. The other thing is, high-EQ girls are going to be less likely to be bunny-boilers because they don't have that same impulsiveness overriding their conscientiousness [[Special:Contributions/2601:5CD:C200:9BE0:DD87:D7DF:595F:1BD7|2601:5CD:C200:9BE0:DD87:D7DF:595F:1BD7]] 23:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
:Arguments about Big 5 vs. GFP just seems to be political arguments as to whether or not to frame 'bad personality' in terms of unidimensional social effectiveness or not. The GFP seems like a pretty awful framework for those who want the psychiatric business out of politics. The only personality traits researchers seem to have a grasp on is extroversion/introversion and the rest just seems open to speculation[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | :Arguments about Big 5 vs. GFP just seems to be political arguments as to whether or not to frame 'bad personality' in terms of unidimensional social effectiveness or not. The GFP seems like a pretty awful framework for those who want the psychiatric business out of politics. Seems to be a framework eerily suited to a Chinese style nightmare 'social credit' system. The only personality traits researchers seem to have a grasp on is extroversion/introversion and the rest just seems open to speculation[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC) | ||