Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Biological essentialism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(ok this is just not true, it's the opposite) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Biological essentialism''' is the claim that biological instincts cannot be overridden and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally behave, on a timescale shorter than thousands of years of human evolution, is a waste of time and potentially dangerous due to the increasingly draconian means that are expected to be used to enforce the change. | '''Biological essentialism''' is the claim that biological instincts cannot be overridden and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally behave, on a timescale shorter than thousands of years of human evolution, is a waste of time and potentially dangerous due to the increasingly draconian means that are expected to be used to enforce the change. | ||
A common counterargument to such fears is that a ''middle ground'' can more realistically be reached, since humans ''are'' malleable to some extent. | A common counterargument to such fears is that a ''middle ground'' can more realistically be reached, since humans ''are'' malleable to some extent. | ||
Biological essentialism has gained popularity in the [[incelosphere]] in the late 2010s. | Biological essentialism has gained popularity in the [[incelosphere]] in the late 2010s. | ||