Jordan Peterson: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
796 bytes removed ,  3 November 2019
No edit summary
Line 71: Line 71:
Jordan is similar to an early Tucker Carlson in many respects with regards to women and dating, as both implied that female nature is a just/rational sorter of male character, and that it is unmanly and hence bad to complain.  Tucker has turned 180 degrees on this rhetoric since his first statements, and Jordan about 90 degrees.
Jordan is similar to an early Tucker Carlson in many respects with regards to women and dating, as both implied that female nature is a just/rational sorter of male character, and that it is unmanly and hence bad to complain.  Tucker has turned 180 degrees on this rhetoric since his first statements, and Jordan about 90 degrees.


===MGTOWs on Peterson===
Some incels have accused Peterson of hypocrisy because on Joe Rogan's podcast Peterson evade answering a difficult question he was asked several times throughout: ''If you say competition is healthy (using the basketball team analogy) then how come competition is bad when it comes to sex?''{{citation needed}}
 
=== MGTOWs on Peterson ===
 
Peterson offended MGTOWs by calling them "pathetic weasels" for avoiding women and complaining about divorce laws.
Peterson offended MGTOWs by calling them "pathetic weasels" for avoiding women and complaining about divorce laws.
Peterson later apologized for this.{{citation needed}}
Peterson later apologized for this.{{citation needed}}
Line 79: Line 82:


Jordan gained criticism from other academics with regards to his narrative about broad philosophical schools that emerged during a time when there was a decline in the institutional foundations of moral objectivism among the Western population.  Philosophers who agree with Jordan about college-campus New Left types and political correctness, such as Hegelian philosopher Slajov Zizek were the most prominent in their criticism.  In a broadcasted debate, Zizek accused Peterson of a-historical alarmism.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsHJ3LvUWTs</ref>  He accused Jordan of injecting motives and beliefs into philosophies where there are none, ignoring the contempt post-modernists had towards Marxists, and propagating false conspiracy theories about constructionism and relativism being a Marxist or, "radical leftist", plot to destabilize the West.  Jordan is criticized as confusing opinions of, "is", with, "ought".  He is criticized as mis-characterizing philosophical schools which address widespread non-objectivity as saying there '''should''' be widespread non-objectivity, or that there should be a death of God. Entire internet forums have organized around hating on Peterson, e.g. [http://old.reddit.com/r/enoughpetersonspam /r/enoughpetersonspam].
Jordan gained criticism from other academics with regards to his narrative about broad philosophical schools that emerged during a time when there was a decline in the institutional foundations of moral objectivism among the Western population.  Philosophers who agree with Jordan about college-campus New Left types and political correctness, such as Hegelian philosopher Slajov Zizek were the most prominent in their criticism.  In a broadcasted debate, Zizek accused Peterson of a-historical alarmism.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsHJ3LvUWTs</ref>  He accused Jordan of injecting motives and beliefs into philosophies where there are none, ignoring the contempt post-modernists had towards Marxists, and propagating false conspiracy theories about constructionism and relativism being a Marxist or, "radical leftist", plot to destabilize the West.  Jordan is criticized as confusing opinions of, "is", with, "ought".  He is criticized as mis-characterizing philosophical schools which address widespread non-objectivity as saying there '''should''' be widespread non-objectivity, or that there should be a death of God. Entire internet forums have organized around hating on Peterson, e.g. [http://old.reddit.com/r/enoughpetersonspam /r/enoughpetersonspam].
=== JRE Podcast & accusations of hypocrisy ===
Podcaster Joe Rogan stumped Peterson with a difficult question several times throughout an interview and ill quote:
{{Quote|''If you say competition is healthy (using the basketball team analogy) then how come competition is bad when it comes to sex?''"}}
Peterson didn't bother explaining why you can't compare a basketball team to the sexual marketplace. But our good friend at IncelWiki (jet112) provides an explanation:
{{Quote|A basketball team needs only winners, it needs only the tallest niggers to dunk. A society needs both winners and losers to operate. It needs the milkman, the coalminer, the truckdriver, the garbageman, the guy that stocks
shelves at wallmart. It needs CONSUMERS, it needs sports fans to cheer on those '''tall basketball niggers''' right? a world can't exist if it only runs on 200IQ MENSA graduates, OR gigantic body builders. Everyone in society has
its own strengths and weaknesses.just because woman are pining for "hot guys", does not mean they should be allowed to fuck supermodels all day, '''got it'''?|Jet112}}


== See more ==
== See more ==
17,538

edits

Navigation menu