Jordan Peterson: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
15 bytes added ,  3 November 2019
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
He claims the goal of perfect equality is nonsensical anyhow as people are inherently unequal ([[biological essentialism]]).
He claims the goal of perfect equality is nonsensical anyhow as people are inherently unequal ([[biological essentialism]]).
Preventing poverty to avoid [[beta uprising|social unrest]] is a more sensible goal. Hierarchies and social stratification yield a strong incentive for status ascension which furthers cooperation because ascension can for the most part, only occurs as compensation for one's cooperation.
Preventing poverty to avoid [[beta uprising|social unrest]] is a more sensible goal. Hierarchies and social stratification yield a strong incentive for status ascension which furthers cooperation because ascension can for the most part, only occurs as compensation for one's cooperation.
One should rather strive for ''equal opportunity'' than ''equal outcome''.
 
Peterson says one should rather strive for ''equal opportunity'' than ''equal outcome''.
Equal outcome overemphasizes the rights of groups and fuels resentment to claim their equal part by shaming and centralized enforcement of compensation (collectivism).
Equal outcome overemphasizes the rights of groups and fuels resentment to claim their equal part by shaming and centralized enforcement of compensation (collectivism).
Equal opportunity, on the other hand, holds people responsible, gives people a sense of accomplishment and real status in proportion to their contributions (individualism).
Equal opportunity, on the other hand, holds people responsible, gives people a sense of accomplishment and real status in proportion to their contributions (individualism).
17,538

edits

Navigation menu