Biological essentialism: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Biological essentialism''' is the claim that biological instincts cannot be overridden or are too hard to override and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally behave, on a timescale shorter than thousands of years of human evolution, is a waste of time and potentially dangerous due to the increasingly draconian means that are expected to be used to enforce the change.
'''Biological essentialism''' is the claim that biological instincts cannot be overridden and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally behave, on a timescale shorter than thousands of years of human evolution, is a waste of time and potentially dangerous due to the increasingly draconian means that are expected to be used to enforce the change.
A common counterargument to such fears is that a ''middle ground'' can more realistically be reached, since humans ''are'' malleable to some extent.
A common counterargument to such fears is that a ''middle ground'' can more realistically be reached, since humans ''are'' malleable to some extent.
Proponents of biological or gender essentialism often have a [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] streak.
Proponents of biological or gender essentialism often have a [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] streak.
17,538

edits

Navigation menu