Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Jordan gained criticism from other academics with regards to his narrative about broad philosophical schools that emerged during a time when there was a decline in the institutional foundations of moral objectivism among the Western population. Philosophers who agree with Jordan about college-campus New Left types and political correctness, such as Hegelian philosopher Slajov Zizek were the most prominent in their criticism. In a broadcasted debate, Zizek accused Peterson of a-historical alarmism.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsHJ3LvUWTs</ref> He accused Jordan of injecting motives and beliefs into philosophies where there are none, ignoring the contempt post-modernists had towards Marxists, and propagating false conspiracy theories about constructionism and relativism being a Marxist or, "radical leftist", plot to destabilize the West. Jordan is criticized as confusing opinions of, "is", with, "ought". He is criticized as mis-characterizing philosophical schools which address widespread non-objectivity as saying there '''should''' be widespread non-objectivity, or that there should be a death of God. | Jordan gained criticism from other academics with regards to his narrative about broad philosophical schools that emerged during a time when there was a decline in the institutional foundations of moral objectivism among the Western population. Philosophers who agree with Jordan about college-campus New Left types and political correctness, such as Hegelian philosopher Slajov Zizek were the most prominent in their criticism. In a broadcasted debate, Zizek accused Peterson of a-historical alarmism.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsHJ3LvUWTs</ref> He accused Jordan of injecting motives and beliefs into philosophies where there are none, ignoring the contempt post-modernists had towards Marxists, and propagating false conspiracy theories about constructionism and relativism being a Marxist or, "radical leftist", plot to destabilize the West. Jordan is criticized as confusing opinions of, "is", with, "ought". He is criticized as mis-characterizing philosophical schools which address widespread non-objectivity as saying there '''should''' be widespread non-objectivity, or that there should be a death of God. | ||
== JRE Podcast & accusations of hypocrisy == | === JRE Podcast & accusations of hypocrisy === | ||
Podcaster Joe Rogan stumped Peterson with a difficult question several times throughout an interview and ill quote: | Podcaster Joe Rogan stumped Peterson with a difficult question several times throughout an interview and ill quote: | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
shelves at wallmart. It needs CONSUMERS, it needs sports fans to cheer on those '''tall basketball niggers''' right? a world can't exist if it only runs on 200IQ MENSA graduates, OR gigantic body builders. Everyone in society has | shelves at wallmart. It needs CONSUMERS, it needs sports fans to cheer on those '''tall basketball niggers''' right? a world can't exist if it only runs on 200IQ MENSA graduates, OR gigantic body builders. Everyone in society has | ||
its own strengths and weaknesses.just because woman are pining for "hot guys", does not mean they should be allowed to fuck supermodels all day, '''got it'''?|Jet112}} | its own strengths and weaknesses.just because woman are pining for "hot guys", does not mean they should be allowed to fuck supermodels all day, '''got it'''?|Jet112}} | ||
== See more == | == See more == |