Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Social constructionism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As such, it borders '''Lockianism''' which refers to John Locke's philosophy that humans are ''blank slates'', meaning that very little is biologically predetermined. Hence, it falls toward the nurture end of the spectrum in the nature and nurture debate. It's all mindbogglingly simple concepts that one is surprised to even see entire philosophical movements to have assembled around them, but hey, that's better than [[masturbation|accomplishing nothing]]! | As such, it borders '''Lockianism''' which refers to John Locke's philosophy that humans are ''blank slates'', meaning that very little is biologically predetermined. Hence, it falls toward the nurture end of the spectrum in the nature and nurture debate. It's all mindbogglingly simple concepts that one is surprised to even see entire philosophical movements to have assembled around them, but hey, that's better than [[masturbation|accomplishing nothing]]! | ||
The New Left and [[anti-incels]] are | The New Left and [[anti-incels]] are radical social constructionists, and hence simply dismiss arguments made by incels on grounds of evolutionary psychology or biology. | ||
Social constructionism was developed in the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism#Berger_and_Luckmann</ref> | Social constructionism was developed in the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism#Berger_and_Luckmann</ref> | ||