Social constructionism: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
==Critique==
==Critique==


Today, and slightly diverging from the original definition, critics of the new left accuse them of having adopted extreme [[Lockianism|Lockianist]], postmodernist assumptions that gender, race, beauty, class, and disability are only or predominantly ''socially constructed'' rather than [[biological essentialism|biological]], and a [[politically correctness|politically correct]] belief that humans are for the most part ''blank slates'' and ''infinitely malleable''.
The new left has heavily adopted extreme social constructionist views that gender, race, beauty, class, and disability are only or predominantly ''socially constructed'' rather than [[biological essentialism|biological]], and a [[politically correctness|politically correct]] and [[Lockianism|Lockianist]] belief that humans are for the most part ''blank slates'' and ''infinitely malleable''.


Critics such as [[Jordan Peterson]] and other [[tradcon|tradcons]] accuse these "postmodern social constructionists", who they see philosophically rooted in [[Marxism]], of a [[Marxism|resentful]] pessimism that aforementioned perceived "social constructions" would be the roots of most evil, invented by powerful [[men|evil people]] as a means of oppression. Such quasi-Marxist beliefs are thought to be driven by a tremendous moral superiority and a naive expectation that by e.g. breaking down gender roles, one can achieve a more harmonious society, even utopia.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vofiOCIWnCY</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm7vmHwfCdg</ref>
Critics of the left, such as [[Jordan Peterson]] and other [[tradcon|tradcons]], accuse these "postmodern social constructionists", who they see philosophically rooted in [[Marxism]], of a [[Marxism|resentful]] pessimism that aforementioned perceived "social constructions" would be the roots of most evil, invented by powerful [[men|evil people]] as a means of oppression.
Such quasi-Marxist beliefs are thought to be driven by a tremendous moral superiority and a naive expectation that by e.g. breaking down gender roles, one can achieve a more harmonious society, even utopia.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vofiOCIWnCY</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm7vmHwfCdg</ref>
They instead hold that culturally evolved social norms are valuable, e.g. relieving the individual from having to figure out the uncountably many ways of making mistakes.
They instead hold that culturally evolved social norms are valuable, e.g. relieving the individual from having to figure out the uncountably many ways of making mistakes.
Another famous critic of blank slatery is [[Steven Pinker]].
Another famous critic of blank slatery is [[Steven Pinker]].
17,538

edits

Navigation menu