Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Social constructionism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Related dynamics can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create polarization over time and define each other's actions in online forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]], [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]], and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. | Related dynamics can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create polarization over time and define each other's actions in online forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]], [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]], and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. | ||
The theory was developed in the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann. Contrary to modern colloquial use of the term ''social constructionism'', early authors had no particular prescriptive stance towards human behavior or modernity. They simply saw liberalism as causing a | The theory was developed in the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann. Contrary to modern colloquial use of the term ''social constructionism'', early authors had no particular prescriptive stance towards human behavior or modernity. They simply saw liberalism as causing a "homelessness of the mind." (Berger). | ||
==Colloquial/pejorative meaning and critique== | ==Colloquial/pejorative meaning and critique== | ||