Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Social constructionism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Social constructionists''' believe that humans develop hardened conceptualizations of each other actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of overly fixed social roles. | '''Social constructionists''' believe that humans develop hardened conceptualizations of each other actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of overly fixed social roles. | ||
This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]] | This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]], [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]], and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. | ||
The theory was created by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to create their own religions. Their books not dedicated exclusively to social constructionism mainly dealt with non-traditional religion. They did not have a prescriptive stance towards modernity, but were rather descriptive. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | The theory was created by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to create their own religions. Their books not dedicated exclusively to social constructionism mainly dealt with non-traditional religion. They did not have a prescriptive stance towards modernity, but were rather descriptive. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | ||