Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Social constructionism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Social constructionists''' believe that humans develop hardened | '''Social constructionists''' believe that humans develop hardened conceptualizations of each other actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of overly fixed social roles. | ||
This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]] and [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]] and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. | This can be seen in the [[anti-incels]]/[[incels]] polarization, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]] and [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]] and [[blackpill|quasi-religious]] activity. | ||
The theory was created by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to create their own religions. Their books not dedicated exclusively to social constructionism mainly dealt with non-traditional religion. They did not have a prescriptive stance towards modernity, but were rather descriptive. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | The theory was created by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to create their own religions. Their books not dedicated exclusively to social constructionism mainly dealt with non-traditional religion. They did not have a prescriptive stance towards modernity, but were rather descriptive. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | ||
| Line 11: | Line 8: | ||
==Colloquial/pejorative meaning and critique== | ==Colloquial/pejorative meaning and critique== | ||
Critics hold that many social constructionists almost ironically find ''themselves'' forming hardened worldviews as a consequence of the polarization with their intellectual opponents. This leads them to extreme assumptions such as that gender, race, class, and disability are only or predominantly ''socially constructed'' rather than a result of evolution, and that humans are for the most part ''blank slates'' and ''infinitely malleable''. | |||
This is accompanied by a feeling of moral superiority, [[Marxism|resentment]] and pessimism, and an expectation by accepting this we can achieve a more harmonious society, even utopia. | |||
Colloquially, social constructivism also means [[Moral Relativism]], [[Lockianism|Lockian philosophy]], and/or [[gender relativism]], and is sometimes used almost synonymously with [[postmodernism]], e.g. by [[Jordan Peterson]] and other [[tradcon|tradcons]]. All of these terms are being used as fairly far away from the original or academic meanings of the term, except for the commonality that they see nurture as more important than nature. | Colloquially, social constructivism also means [[Moral Relativism]], [[Lockianism|Lockian philosophy]], and/or [[gender relativism]], and is sometimes used almost synonymously with [[postmodernism]], e.g. by [[Jordan Peterson]] and other [[tradcon|tradcons]]. All of these terms are being used as fairly far away from the original or academic meanings of the term, except for the commonality that they see nurture as more important than nature. | ||