Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Social constructionism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Social constructionists''' believe that humans develop hardened conceptualisation of each other actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of reciprocal social roles. This can be seen in the [[inceltears]] / [[incel]] divide, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. After this, certain practices become codified, such as posting something for it to emerge on [[inceltears]]. Certain forum members behave in certain ways often because they have an oppositional social role to a member in a rival forum. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]] and [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]] [[blackpill|religious]] activity. | '''Social constructionists''' believe that humans develop hardened conceptualisation of each other actions over time, which leads to habitual [[LARP|role-playing]] of reciprocal social roles. This can be seen in the [[inceltears]] / [[incel]] divide, where firmly entrenched memes and roles create a split over time and define each others actions within forums. After this, certain practices become codified, such as posting something for it to emerge on [[inceltears]]. Certain forum members behave in certain ways often because they have an oppositional social role to a member in a rival forum. The social roles of modern blackpill and [[anti-incel]] forums become codified almost to the point of [[incels.co|subcultural]] and [[anti-incels|not traditionally moral]] [[blackpill|religious]] activity. | ||
The theory was created by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to [[blackpill|create their own religions]]. They did not have a prescriptive stance towards this, but were rather descriptive. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | The theory was created by the 1960s philosophers Berger and Luckmann, who both saw modernity and the liberalization of traditional institutions as causing people to have loose moral moorings and to [[blackpill|create their own religions]]. Their books not dedicated exclusively to social constructionism mainly dealt with non-traditional religion. They did not have a prescriptive stance towards this, but were rather descriptive. The main proponents of social constructionism, saw liberalism as causing a | ||
{{Quote|"homelessness of the mind."|Berger}} | {{Quote|"homelessness of the mind."|Berger}} | ||