Social constructionism: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Social constructionism (edit)

Revision as of 11:19, 29 October 2019

1,880 bytes removed ,  29 October 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


{{Quote|"homelessness of the mind."|Berger}}
{{Quote|"homelessness of the mind."|Berger}}


==Social constructionism vs progressivism==
==Social constructionism vs progressivism==
Line 16: Line 17:
==Social construction vs biological essentialism==
==Social construction vs biological essentialism==
Scientific consensus rejects any hard-line nature vs. nuture stance, including social deconstructionism and [[biological essentialism]] respectively.  However, post [[neoliberal]]ism. the science is clear that most current Western human behaviour is biologically rather than socially determined.  Humans are both malleable and have natural impulses/behaviours. Many emotions, tendencies and traits are universal and fixed, while others are not universal across cultures and Y-DNA.
Scientific consensus rejects any hard-line nature vs. nuture stance, including social deconstructionism and [[biological essentialism]] respectively.  However, post [[neoliberal]]ism. the science is clear that most current Western human behaviour is biologically rather than socially determined.  Humans are both malleable and have natural impulses/behaviours. Many emotions, tendencies and traits are universal and fixed, while others are not universal across cultures and Y-DNA.
===Race===
Humans all have basically the same facial movement in response to emotional stimuli, across all cultures.  This falls in line with [[biological essentialism]].  Cultures vary wildly in violent behavior among people with similar Y-DNA, as well as globally, which falls in line with social construction theory.  However, there are more countries with people of E3* Y-DNA haplogroup in countries with the top 50% of violent behaviour, which falls in line with biological essentialism.
Social constructionists often explain human behaviour as socially determined by wealth and political power.  Whereas biological determinists and racialists would state that the poverty/politics and associated ill effects are a direct result of evolution, and economic poverty is likely to be permanent in homogenous E3* Y-DNA haplogroups.  Social constructionists in turn say that sub-sarahan africa could be more prosperous than other countries, but foreign pillaging of E3* haplogroup countries rather than the E3* Y-DNA itself caused resource shortages and led to centuries of violence.
===Sex===
[[Blackpill]]ers would state that non-R1B haplogroup immigration into R1B haplogroup countries is creating polygamy, violence, and ultimately inceldom in those countries.  And so the solution for blackpillers is an ethnostate and culturally arranged monogamous marriages.  [[Sexual Marxism|Sexual marxists]] may or may not believe this is happening, but think that with a sufficiently authoritarian state, this would not be an issue, and so their solution would be government arranged, subsidized, or promoted partnerships, rather than an ethnostate with culturally arranged marriage.
==Criticism==
Social constructionists are criticized by racialists for taking an unnecessarily dsmissive stance towards the idea that behaviour is sometimes determined by broad ancestry and Y-DNA.


== See also ==
== See also ==
William
Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837

edits

Retrieved from "https://incels.wiki/w/Special:MobileDiff/30789"

Navigation menu