Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Scientific Blackpill (edit)

Revision as of 23:56, 4 August 2019

No change in size ,  4 August 2019
m
→‎MeToo
Line 3,146: Line 3,146:
* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0732118X16300320
* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0732118X16300320
* https://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/McAndrew-Koehnke-2016.pdf
* https://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/McAndrew-Koehnke-2016.pdf
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Women permit 'creepy' behavior from attractive but not unattractive men due to the 'horn effect'</span>===
----
Gibson & Gore (2015) conducted a study regarding women's perception of men's 'norm violating' behavior being influenced by their level of physical attractiveness, based on the well-proven concept of the halo effect, regarding physical attractiveness.
The participants (n=170) female college students, were given a sheet describing two different scenarios: The first scenario was a common innocuous behavior (a boy asking to borrow her pen in class) and the second 'norm violating' scenario involved a strange man approaching her on campus and asking to take 'modeling' photographs of her.
Attached to the worksheet were two faces, one a young attractive man the other an unattractive man, both were wearing identical clothing and were Caucasian, with each participant being exposed to either face or scenario.
The participants were required to answer if they would acquiesce to the man's request in both conditions, her level of comfort and her perception of the man's character.
It was found that the women's perception of the men's character and her level of comfort were largely unaffected by the looks of the man in low norm violation condition, but their perception of the man's character and her level of comfort were significantly affected by the man's looks in the high norm violation condition, with the unattractive man being viewed far more harshly.
<span style="font-size:125%>'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''Facially unattractive males receive a more negative response in terms of perceived characteristics from violating social norms than facially attractive males.''
* ''The current experiment found that, while social violation of norms accounted for much of the differences between conditions, a devil effect occurred amplifying the negative feelings toward the unattractive male. In this way, a ‘‘double’’ devil effect occurred between norm violation and unattractiveness.''
* ''Online dating, in particular, is susceptible to both the halo and devil attractiveness biases. These biases based on attractiveness often in?uence the perception of a user’s pro?le and that of the individual as a whole.''
* ''Risk factors for a devil effect occurring is not exclusive to social dating. The judicial system has been shown to be susceptible to attractiveness halo and devil effects when determining sentences, with the unattractive defendant receiving a more severe penalty than the attractive defendant for committing the same crime.''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12147-015-9142-5


===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Men are equally likely as women to be victims of violent crime</span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Men are equally likely as women to be victims of violent crime</span>===
Line 3,210: Line 3,228:
* https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm
* https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm
* https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
* https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Women permit 'creepy' behavior from attractive but not unattractive men due to the 'horn effect'</span>===
----
Gibson & Gore (2015) conducted a study regarding women's perception of men's 'norm violating' behavior being influenced by their level of physical attractiveness, based on the well-proven concept of the halo effect, regarding physical attractiveness.
The participants (n=170) female college students, were given a sheet describing two different scenarios: The first scenario was a common innocuous behavior (a boy asking to borrow her pen in class) and the second 'norm violating' scenario involved a strange man approaching her on campus and asking to take 'modeling' photographs of her.
Attached to the worksheet were two faces, one a young attractive man the other an unattractive man, both were wearing identical clothing and were Caucasian, with each participant being exposed to either face or scenario.
The participants were required to answer if they would acquiesce to the man's request in both conditions, her level of comfort and her perception of the man's character.
It was found that the women's perception of the men's character and her level of comfort were largely unaffected by the looks of the man in low norm violation condition, but their perception of the man's character and her level of comfort were significantly affected by the man's looks in the high norm violation condition, with the unattractive man being viewed far more harshly.
<span style="font-size:125%>'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''Facially unattractive males receive a more negative response in terms of perceived characteristics from violating social norms than facially attractive males.''
* ''The current experiment found that, while social violation of norms accounted for much of the differences between conditions, a devil effect occurred amplifying the negative feelings toward the unattractive male. In this way, a ‘‘double’’ devil effect occurred between norm violation and unattractiveness.''
* ''Online dating, in particular, is susceptible to both the halo and devil attractiveness biases. These biases based on attractiveness often in?uence the perception of a user’s pro?le and that of the individual as a whole.''
* ''Risk factors for a devil effect occurring is not exclusive to social dating. The judicial system has been shown to be susceptible to attractiveness halo and devil effects when determining sentences, with the unattractive defendant receiving a more severe penalty than the attractive defendant for committing the same crime.''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12147-015-9142-5


===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">More teenage boys are victims of 'partner directed violence' than teenage girls</span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">More teenage boys are victims of 'partner directed violence' than teenage girls</span>===
Retrieved from "https://incels.wiki/w/Special:MobileDiff/22273"

Navigation menu